Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 680M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 680M SLI with Radeon RX 5700 XT, including specs and performance data.

GTX 680M SLI
2012
2x 4 GB GDDR5
16.49

RX 5700 XT outperforms GTX 680M SLI by a whopping 161% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking30675
Place by popularitynot in top-10061
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.03100.00
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code nameN13E-GTXNavi 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2012 (12 years ago)7 July 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399
Current price$149 $111 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5700 XT has 244% better value for money than GTX 680M SLI.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores26882560
Core clock speed720 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1905 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rateno data304.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 680M SLI and Radeon RX 5700 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed3600 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
VR Readyno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkanno data+
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 680M SLI 16.49
RX 5700 XT 43.07
+161%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 680M SLI by 161% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 680M SLI 10952
RX 5700 XT 35823
+227%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 680M SLI by 227% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 680M SLI 32635
RX 5700 XT 83961
+157%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 680M SLI by 157% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p133
−126%
300−350
+126%
Full HD111
−9.9%
122
+9.9%
1440p27−30
−174%
74
+174%
4K16−18
−194%
47
+194%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30 no data
Battlefield 5 50−55 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 75−80 no data
Hitman 3 30−35 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70 no data
Metro Exodus 55−60 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30 no data
Battlefield 5 50−55 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 75−80 no data
Hitman 3 30−35 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70 no data
Metro Exodus 55−60 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 75−80 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
Hitman 3 20−22 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35 no data
Metro Exodus 30−33 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14 no data
Hitman 3 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data

This is how GTX 680M SLI and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT is 126% faster in 900p
  • RX 5700 XT is 10% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5700 XT is 174% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5700 XT is 194% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.49 43.07
Recency 4 June 2012 7 July 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 680M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 680M SLI is a notebook card while Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
GeForce GTX 680M SLI
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 6975 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.