GeForce RTX 3090 vs GTX 680M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 680M SLI with GeForce RTX 3090, including specs and performance data.

GTX 680M SLI
2012
2x 4 GB GDDR5
16.49

RTX 3090 outperforms GTX 680M SLI by a whopping 321% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking30619
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.1216.79
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN13E-GTXAmpere GA102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2012 (12 years ago)24 September 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,499
Current price$149 $1198 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 680M SLI has 73% better value for money than RTX 3090.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores268810496
Core clock speed720 MHz1400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data350 Watt
Texture fill rateno data556.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 680M SLI and GeForce RTX 3090 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data313 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed3600 MHz19500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data936.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkanno data1.2
CUDA+8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 680M SLI 16.49
RTX 3090 69.36
+321%

RTX 3090 outperforms GTX 680M SLI by 321% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 680M SLI 10952
RTX 3090 61518
+462%

RTX 3090 outperforms GTX 680M SLI by 462% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 680M SLI 32635
RTX 3090 124350
+281%

RTX 3090 outperforms GTX 680M SLI by 281% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p133
−314%
550−600
+314%
Full HD111
−75.7%
195
+75.7%
1440p30−35
−343%
133
+343%
4K21−24
−324%
89
+324%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−360%
207
+360%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−354%
159
+354%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−371%
113
+371%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−344%
220−230
+344%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−341%
110−120
+341%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−340%
176
+340%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−333%
110−120
+333%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−323%
160−170
+323%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−323%
254
+323%
Hitman 3 27−30
−333%
117
+333%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−324%
403
+324%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−380%
144
+380%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−333%
130
+333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
−321%
505
+321%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−337%
131
+337%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
−377%
143
+377%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−321%
101
+321%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−344%
220−230
+344%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−341%
110−120
+341%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−331%
151
+331%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−333%
110−120
+333%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−323%
160−170
+323%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−334%
210−220
+334%
Hitman 3 27−30
−356%
123
+356%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−351%
290−300
+351%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−337%
153
+337%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−333%
130
+333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
−323%
402
+323%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
−334%
369
+334%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−342%
199
+342%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−350%
108
+350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−329%
90
+329%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−341%
110−120
+341%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−347%
134
+347%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−333%
110−120
+333%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−334%
217
+334%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−321%
295
+321%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−339%
351
+339%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−353%
181
+353%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−346%
107
+346%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−330%
129
+330%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−371%
160−170
+371%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−380%
144
+380%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−343%
93
+343%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−333%
78
+333%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−342%
106
+342%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−343%
93
+343%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−328%
171
+328%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−338%
197
+338%
Hitman 3 27−30
−326%
115
+326%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−324%
233
+324%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−363%
139
+363%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
−343%
266
+343%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−334%
152
+334%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−329%
90
+329%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−323%
127
+323%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−383%
85−90
+383%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−331%
65−70
+331%
Hitman 3 18−20
−361%
83
+361%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−342%
100−110
+342%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−362%
97
+362%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−337%
153
+337%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−338%
70
+338%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−367%
56
+367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−325%
50−55
+325%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−360%
46
+360%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−337%
153
+337%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−380%
144
+380%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−350%
108
+350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−329%
60
+329%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−363%
111
+363%

This is how GTX 680M SLI and RTX 3090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3090 is 314% faster in 900p
  • RTX 3090 is 76% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3090 is 343% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3090 is 324% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.49 69.36
Recency 4 June 2012 24 September 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm

The GeForce RTX 3090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 680M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 680M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
GeForce GTX 680M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 78593 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.