Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce GTX 670MX SLI

Place in performance ranking	419	341
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	no data	9.14
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	N13E-GR	Navi 14 / R19M-E85
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 October 2012 (11 years ago)	29 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	no data	$998

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	1408
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1327 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1645 MHz
Number of transistors	5080 Million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	85 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	144.8

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 670MX SLI and Radeon RX 5500M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	4 GB
Memory bus width	2x 192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2800 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.0
Vulkan	no data	1.2.131
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 670MX SLI 9.80

RX 5500M 14.19
+44.8%

Radeon RX 5500M outperforms GeForce GTX 670MX SLI by 45% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 670MX SLI 7042

RX 5500M 16476
+134%

Radeon RX 5500M outperforms GeForce GTX 670MX SLI by 134% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	71 +24.6%	57 −24.6%
1440p	30−35 −56.7%	47 +56.7%
4K	18−21 −66.7%	30 +66.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−267%

55
+267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −115%	43 +115%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −273%	56 +273%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −48.5%	45−50 +48.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −262%	94 +262%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −187%	43 +187%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −54.2%	35−40 +54.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −50%	35−40 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −42.9%	50−55 +42.9%
Hitman 3	24−27 −236%	84 +236%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −235%	67 +235%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −271%	63 +271%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −42.9%	30−33 +42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −241%	58 +241%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −100%	40 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −73.3%	26 +73.3%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −182%	93 +182%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −181%	73 +181%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −120%	33 +120%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −158%	62 +158%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −50%	35−40 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −42.9%	50−55 +42.9%
Hitman 3	24−27 −120%	55 +120%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −170%	54 +170%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −160%	39 +160%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −88.2%	32 +88.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −176%	58 +176%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −260%	72 +260%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −200%	51 +200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −55%	31 +55%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +7.1%	14 −7.1%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −127%	75 +127%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −100%	30 +100%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −146%	59 +146%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −96.2%	51 +96.2%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −42.9%	50−55 +42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −125%	45 +125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −29.4%	22 +29.4%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −150%	35 +150%
Hitman 3	14−16 −207%	46 +207%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −127%	34 +127%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −213%	25 +213%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −146%	32 +146%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −66.7%	14−16 +66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −66.7%	10 +66.7%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −175%	44 +175%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −220%	48 +220%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −194%	47 +194%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −55.6%	27−30 +55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −300%	16 +300%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −233%	20 +233%
Hitman 3	9−10 −156%	23 +156%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −12.5%	9 +12.5%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −200%	15 +200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Battlefield 5	8−9 −100%	16 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −150%	25 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −58.3%	18−20 +58.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%

This is how GTX 670MX SLI and RX 5500M compete in popular games:

GTX 670MX SLI is 24.6% faster than RX 5500M in 1080p
RX 5500M is 56.7% faster than GTX 670MX SLI in 1440p
RX 5500M is 66.7% faster than GTX 670MX SLI in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 670MX SLI is 7.1% faster than the RX 5500M.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5500M is 300% faster than the GTX 670MX SLI.

All in all, in popular games: