Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce GTX 670MX SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 670MX SLI and Radeon RX 5500M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 670MX SLI
2012
150 Watt
10.05

RX 5500M outperforms GTX 670MX SLI by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking449358
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.6611.80
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameN13E-GRNavi 14
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 October 2012 (12 years ago)7 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19201408
Core clock speed600 MHz1375 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1645 MHz
Number of transistors5080 Million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rateno data144.8
Floating-point processing powerno data4.632 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus width2x 192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 670MX SLI 10.05
RX 5500M 14.43
+43.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 670MX SLI 7042
RX 5500M 16476
+134%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD71
+24.6%
57
−24.6%
1440p35−40
−60%
56
+60%
4K18−20
−50%
27
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−267%
55
+267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−79.2%
43
+79.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−273%
56
+273%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−48.4%
45−50
+48.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−165%
53
+165%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−187%
43
+187%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−43.5%
30−35
+43.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−39.3%
35−40
+39.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−40.9%
90−95
+40.9%
Hitman 3 18−20
−205%
58
+205%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−170%
146
+170%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−54.8%
45−50
+54.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−111%
57
+111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−43.8%
45−50
+43.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−168%
169
+168%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−37.5%
30−35
+37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−73.3%
26
+73.3%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−9.7%
34
+9.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−140%
48
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−120%
33
+120%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−43.5%
30−35
+43.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−39.3%
35−40
+39.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−40.9%
90−95
+40.9%
Hitman 3 18−20
−205%
58
+205%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−167%
144
+167%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−16.1%
36
+16.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−92.6%
52
+92.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−156%
82
+156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−30.8%
30−35
+30.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−167%
168
+167%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−29.2%
31
+29.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+7.1%
14
−7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−30%
26
+30%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−100%
30
+100%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−43.5%
30−35
+43.5%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−40.9%
90−95
+40.9%
Hitman 3 18−20
−163%
50
+163%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−27.8%
69
+27.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−125%
72
+125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−73.1%
45
+73.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+186%
22
−186%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−100%
54
+100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−184%
54
+184%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−66.7%
10
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−50%
14−16
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−65.9%
70−75
+65.9%
Hitman 3 12−14
−154%
33
+154%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−175%
55
+175%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−236%
47
+236%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−92.3%
24−27
+92.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−163%
163
+163%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−150%
40
+150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−222%
29
+222%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Hitman 3 6−7
−50%
9
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−54.8%
65
+54.8%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−250%
28
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−122%
20
+122%

This is how GTX 670MX SLI and RX 5500M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 670MX SLI is 25% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5500M is 60% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5500M is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 670MX SLI is 186% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 5500M is 273% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 670MX SLI is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • RX 5500M is ahead in 70 tests (97%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.05 14.43
Recency 1 October 2012 7 October 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 85 Watt

RX 5500M has a 43.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 76.5% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5500M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
AMD Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 670MX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 351 vote

Rate Radeon RX 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.