GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs GTX 660

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 660
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 140 Watt
10.36
+192%

GTX 660 outperforms GT 640 Rev. 2 by a whopping 192% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking434717
Place by popularity58not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.270.19
Power efficiency5.125.02
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameGK106GK208
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 September 2012 (12 years ago)29 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 660 has 1621% better value for money than GT 640 Rev. 2.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960384
Core clock speed980 MHz1046 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,540 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt49 Watt
Texture fill rate82.5633.47
Floating-point processing power1.981 TFLOPS0.8033 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs8032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x8
Length241 mm145 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width192-bit GDDR564 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s1252 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/s40.06 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA+3.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
+194%
16−18
−194%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.875.56

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.36 3.55
Recency 6 September 2012 29 May 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 49 Watt

GTX 660 has a 191.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GT 640 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 185.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 660 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GeForce GTX 660
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 4242 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 26 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.