NVS 5400M vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

GTX 650 Ti Boost
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 134 Watt
8.64
+433%

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost outperforms NVS 5400M by a whopping 433% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking465913
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.000.05
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGK106N13P-NS1
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date26 March 2013 (11 years ago)1 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data
Current price$285 (1.7x MSRP)$381

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 650 Ti Boost has 1900% better value for money than NVS 5400M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76896
CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed980 MHz660 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,540 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)134 Watt35 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate62.7 billion/sec10.56
Floating-point performance1,585 gflops253.4 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and NVS 5400M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM
Length9.5" (24.1 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsOne 6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support4 Displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data
3D Vision Live+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 650 Ti Boost 8.64
+433%
NVS 5400M 1.62

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost outperforms NVS 5400M by 433% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 650 Ti Boost 3338
+434%
NVS 5400M 625

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost outperforms NVS 5400M by 434% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 650 Ti Boost 9284
+348%
NVS 5400M 2071

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost outperforms NVS 5400M by 348% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+400%
20
−400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.64 1.62
Recency 26 March 2013 1 June 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 134 Watt 35 Watt

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 5400M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is a desktop card while NVS 5400M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
NVIDIA NVS 5400M
NVS 5400M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 336 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 44 votes

Rate NVS 5400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.