750 vs 650 Ti Boost

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

GTX 650 Ti Boost
8.65

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking459457
Place by popularitynot in top-10071
Value for money0.970.82
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameGK106GM107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date26 March 2013 (11 years old)18 February 2014 (10 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 $119
Current price$285 (1.7x MSRP)$340 (2.9x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 650 Ti Boost has 18% better value for money than GTX 750.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768512
CUDA cores768512
Core clock speed980 MHz1020 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz1085 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)134 Watt55 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °C95 °C
Texture fill rate62.7 billion/sec34.72
Floating-point performance1,585 gflops1,111 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length9.5" (24.1 cm)5.7" (14.5 cm)
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsOne 6-pinNone
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s5.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/s80 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI
Multi monitor support4 Displays3 displays
HDMI++
HDCP++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x15362048x1536
Audio input for HDMIInternalInternal

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
Blu Ray 3Dno data+
3D Gaming++
3D Vision++
3D Vision Live++

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.34.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 650 Ti Boost 8.65
GTX 750 8.67
+0.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 650 Ti Boost 3354
GTX 750 3360
+0.2%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 650 Ti Boost 4390
+10.6%
GTX 750 3970

650 Ti Boost outperforms 750 by 11% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 650 Ti Boost 9364
GTX 750 9371
+0.1%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 650 Ti Boost 8785
GTX 750 8809
+0.3%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 650 Ti Boost 6809
GTX 750 10448
+53.4%

750 outperforms 650 Ti Boost by 53% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 650 Ti Boost 27
GTX 750 28
+3.7%

750 outperforms 650 Ti Boost by 4% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 8.65 8.67
Recency 26 March 2013 18 February 2014
Cost $169 $119
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 134 Watt 55 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and GeForce GTX 750. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GeForce GTX 750

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 325 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1987 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.