Quadro RTX A6000 vs GeForce GTX 580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 580 with Quadro RTX A6000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 580
2010
1536 MB GDDR5, 244 Watt
11.82

RTX A6000 outperforms GTX 580 by a whopping 251% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking37884
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.170.49
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGF110Ampere
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date9 November 2010 (13 years ago)5 October 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $4,649
Current price$14.89 (0x MSRP)$8932 (1.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 580 has 1567% better value for money than RTX A6000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51210752
CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed772 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1800 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)244 Watt300 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate49.4 billion/sec625.0
Floating-point performance1,581.1 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)267 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsOne 6-pin and One 8-pin8-pin EPS
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB48 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2004 MHz (4008 data rate)16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.4 GB/s768.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI4x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.12.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 580 11.82
RTX A6000 41.48
+251%

Quadro RTX A6000 outperforms GeForce GTX 580 by 251% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 580 6065
RTX A6000 50957
+740%

Quadro RTX A6000 outperforms GeForce GTX 580 by 740% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 580 21941
RTX A6000 89510
+308%

Quadro RTX A6000 outperforms GeForce GTX 580 by 308% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 580 4970
RTX A6000 27511
+454%

Quadro RTX A6000 outperforms GeForce GTX 580 by 454% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p53
−240%
180−190
+240%
Full HD96
−74%
167
+74%
1200p78
−246%
270−280
+246%
1440p35−40
−269%
129
+269%
4K30−35
−273%
112
+273%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−311%
70−75
+311%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−200%
70−75
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−300%
70−75
+300%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−250%
130−140
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−250%
80−85
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−311%
70−75
+311%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−230%
85−90
+230%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−209%
100−110
+209%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−172%
150−160
+172%
Hitman 3 21−24
−286%
85−90
+286%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−406%
248
+406%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−205%
110−120
+205%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−197%
95−100
+197%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−733%
300
+733%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−200%
70−75
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−300%
70−75
+300%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−250%
130−140
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−250%
80−85
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−311%
70−75
+311%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−230%
85−90
+230%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−209%
100−110
+209%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−172%
150−160
+172%
Hitman 3 21−24
−286%
85−90
+286%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−245%
160−170
+245%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+11.8%
34
−11.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−197%
95−100
+197%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−714%
293
+714%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−1128%
307
+1128%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−200%
70−75
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−300%
70−75
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−250%
80−85
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−311%
70−75
+311%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−230%
85−90
+230%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−172%
150−160
+172%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−357%
224
+357%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−700%
288
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−620%
180
+620%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−197%
95−100
+197%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−252%
80−85
+252%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−385%
95−100
+385%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−475%
45−50
+475%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−357%
60−65
+357%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−467%
30−35
+467%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−174%
52
+174%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−295%
85−90
+295%
Hitman 3 14−16
−260%
50−55
+260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−775%
210
+775%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−232%
63
+232%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−1272%
247
+1272%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−408%
60−65
+408%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−443%
35−40
+443%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−279%
70−75
+279%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−282%
40−45
+282%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Hitman 3 8−9
−325%
30−35
+325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−342%
50−55
+342%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−371%
30−35
+371%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1360%
146
+1360%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−314%
27−30
+314%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−317%
24−27
+317%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−287%
55−60
+287%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1042%
137
+1042%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−425%
63
+425%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−236%
35−40
+236%

This is how GTX 580 and RTX A6000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A6000 is 240% faster in 900p
  • RTX A6000 is 74% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A6000 is 246% faster in 1200p
  • RTX A6000 is 269% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A6000 is 273% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 580 is 12% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A6000 is 1360% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 580 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RTX A6000 is ahead in 71 test (99%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.82 41.48
Recency 9 November 2010 5 October 2020
Cost $499 $4649
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 244 Watt 300 Watt

The Quadro RTX A6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 580 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 580 is a desktop card while Quadro RTX A6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
GeForce GTX 580
NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
Quadro RTX A6000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 443 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 450 votes

Rate Quadro RTX A6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.