Radeon R9 M485X vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI

Place in the ranking	575	466
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	4.50	2.62
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	N12E-GS	Amethyst
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	6 January 2011 (14 years ago)	15 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2048
Core clock speed	775 MHz	723 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	92.54
Floating-point processing power	no data	2.961 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	no data	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	no data	8 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	no data	6.3
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.0
Vulkan	-	1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −46.2%	18−20 +46.2%
Elden Ring	16−18 −58.8%	27−30 +58.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −55%	30−35 +55%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −46.2%	18−20 +46.2%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −46.2%	35−40 +46.2%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −52.9%	24−27 +52.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −31.6%	24−27 +31.6%
Valorant	20−22 −75%	35−40 +75%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −55%	30−35 +55%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −46.2%	18−20 +46.2%
Dota 2	21−24 −54.5%	30−35 +54.5%
Elden Ring	16−18 −58.8%	27−30 +58.8%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −30%	35−40 +30%
Fortnite	35−40 −43.6%	55−60 +43.6%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −46.2%	35−40 +46.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −54.5%	30−35 +54.5%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −52.9%	24−27 +52.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −37%	70−75 +37%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −31.6%	24−27 +31.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −45%	27−30 +45%
Valorant	20−22 −75%	35−40 +75%
World of Tanks	100−110 −36.3%	130−140 +36.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −55%	30−35 +55%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −46.2%	18−20 +46.2%
Dota 2	21−24 −54.5%	30−35 +54.5%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −30%	35−40 +30%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −46.2%	35−40 +46.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −37%	70−75 +37%
Valorant	20−22 −75%	35−40 +75%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Elden Ring	8−9 −62.5%	12−14 +62.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −21.1%	45−50 +21.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
World of Tanks	45−50 −44.7%	65−70 +44.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −42.9%	20−22 +42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −66.7%	20−22 +66.7%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Valorant	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	4−5
Dota 2	18−20 −11.1%	20−22 +11.1%
Elden Ring	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −17.6%	20−22 +17.6%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −47.4%	27−30 +47.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −17.6%	20−22 +17.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Counter-Strike 2	0−1	4−5
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	18−20 −11.1%	20−22 +11.1%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Fortnite	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Valorant	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M485X is 150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

R9 M485X is ahead in 60 tests (98%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.54	9.52
Recency	6 January 2011	15 May 2016
Chip lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	250 Watt

GTX 560M SLI has 150% lower power consumption.

R9 M485X, on the other hand, has a 45.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R9 M485X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560M SLI in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.