Radeon R9 M485X vs GeForce GTX 680MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R9 M485X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 680MX
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 122 Watt
10.73
+13.2%

GTX 680MX outperforms R9 M485X by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking396434
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.020.56
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 3 (2014−2016)
GPU code nameno dataAmethyst
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)14 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Current price$200 $2500

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 680MX has 1511% better value for money than R9 M485X.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362048
CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed720 MHz723 MHz
Number of transistors3540 Million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate92.2 billion/sec92.54
Floating-point performanceno data2,961 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R9 M485X compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
Vulkanno data1.2.131
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 680MX 10.73
+13.2%
R9 M485X 9.48

GeForce GTX 680MX outperforms Radeon R9 M485X by 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 680MX 4142
+13.2%
R9 M485X 3660

GeForce GTX 680MX outperforms Radeon R9 M485X by 13% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD52
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Hitman 3 20−22 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Hitman 3 20−22 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 20−22 no data
Hitman 3 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9 no data
Hitman 3 7−8 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12 no data
Metro Exodus 10−12 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11 no data

This is how GTX 680MX and R9 M485X compete in popular games:

  • GTX 680MX is 16% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.73 9.48
Recency 23 October 2012 14 May 2016
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 250 Watt

The GeForce GTX 680MX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M485X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
GeForce GTX 680MX
AMD Radeon R9 M485X
Radeon R9 M485X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 24 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M485X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.