Quadro T2000 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI

Place in the ranking	570	263
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	4.50	23.98
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	N12E-GS	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	6 January 2011 (13 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	1024
Core clock speed	775 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	114.2
Floating-point processing power	no data	3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	no data	4 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 560M SLI 6.48

T2000 Mobile 20.70
+219%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 560M SLI 3616

T2000 Mobile 13524
+274%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−11

−230%

30−35
+230%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −188%	45−50 +188%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
Battlefield 5	18−20 −278%	65−70 +278%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −223%	40−45 +223%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −230%	30−35 +230%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −243%	45−50 +243%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −206%	55−60 +206%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −202%	120−130 +202%
Hitman 3	12−14 −215%	40−45 +215%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −161%	95−100 +161%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −318%	70−75 +318%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −224%	55−60 +224%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −214%	65−70 +214%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −82.4%	90−95 +82.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −188%	45−50 +188%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
Battlefield 5	18−20 −278%	65−70 +278%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −223%	40−45 +223%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −230%	30−35 +230%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −243%	45−50 +243%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −206%	55−60 +206%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −202%	120−130 +202%
Hitman 3	12−14 −215%	40−45 +215%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −161%	95−100 +161%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −318%	70−75 +318%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −224%	55−60 +224%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −214%	65−70 +214%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −130%	45−50 +130%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −82.4%	90−95 +82.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −188%	45−50 +188%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −223%	40−45 +223%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −230%	30−35 +230%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −243%	45−50 +243%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −202%	120−130 +202%
Hitman 3	12−14 −215%	40−45 +215%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −161%	95−100 +161%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −214%	65−70 +214%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −130%	45−50 +130%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −82.4%	90−95 +82.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−224%

55−60
+224%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −233%	40−45 +233%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −220%	30−35 +220%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −850%	18−20 +850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −283%	21−24 +283%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 −480%	110−120 +480%
Hitman 3	10−11 −140%	24−27 +140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −200%	40−45 +200%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −550%	35−40 +550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 −1333%	40−45 +1333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −195%	120−130 +195%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

−209%

30−35
+209%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −300%	20−22 +300%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
Hitman 3	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −529%	100−110 +529%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −633%	21−24 +633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −600%	21−24 +600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	4−5
Far Cry 5	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −367%	27−30 +367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

−157%

18−20
+157%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 2300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, T2000 Mobile surpassed GTX 560M SLI in all 71 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.48	20.70
Recency	6 January 2011	27 May 2019
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	60 Watt

T2000 Mobile has a 219.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.