Quadro T2000 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 960M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GTX 960M
2015
4 GB GDDR5
8.78

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 960M by 135% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking456248
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.444.69
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN16P-GXN19P-Q3
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date12 March 2015 (9 years ago)27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price$799 $2221

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

T2000 Mobile has 226% better value for money than GTX 960M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401024
CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1096 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speed1202 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate47.04114.2
Floating-point performance1,505 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 960M and Quadro T2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
BatteryBoost+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 960M 8.78
T2000 Mobile 20.63
+135%

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 960M by 135% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 960M 3399
T2000 Mobile 7985
+135%

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 960M by 135% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 960M 5278
T2000 Mobile 13524
+156%

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 960M by 156% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p95
−132%
220−230
+132%
Full HD36
−122%
80−85
+122%
1440p15
−133%
35−40
+133%
4K13
−131%
30−35
+131%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−136%
30−35
+136%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
−68%
40−45
+68%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−177%
35−40
+177%
Battlefield 5 38
−81.6%
65−70
+81.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−125%
50−55
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−136%
30−35
+136%
Far Cry 5 28
−92.9%
50−55
+92.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 27
−104%
55−60
+104%
Forza Horizon 4 35
−103%
70−75
+103%
Hitman 3 21−24
−173%
60−65
+173%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−144%
40−45
+144%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−127%
30−35
+127%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24
−83.3%
40−45
+83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 19
−121%
40−45
+121%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−177%
35−40
+177%
Battlefield 5 31
−123%
65−70
+123%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−125%
50−55
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−136%
30−35
+136%
Far Cry 5 25
−116%
50−55
+116%
Far Cry New Dawn 25
−120%
55−60
+120%
Forza Horizon 4 31
−129%
70−75
+129%
Hitman 3 21−24
−173%
60−65
+173%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−144%
40−45
+144%
Metro Exodus 12
−175%
30−35
+175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−127%
30−35
+127%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
−132%
40−45
+132%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 11
−282%
40−45
+282%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−177%
35−40
+177%
Battlefield 5 26
−165%
65−70
+165%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−136%
30−35
+136%
Far Cry 5 23
−135%
50−55
+135%
Far Cry New Dawn 23
−139%
55−60
+139%
Forza Horizon 4 25
−184%
70−75
+184%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−221%
45−50
+221%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−138%
30−35
+138%
Hitman 3 14−16
−136%
30−35
+136%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−150%
14−16
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
−145%
27−30
+145%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
−175%
21−24
+175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
Battlefield 5 17
−171%
45−50
+171%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Far Cry 5 15
−133%
35−40
+133%
Far Cry New Dawn 15
−167%
40−45
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 18
−133%
40−45
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−188%
21−24
+188%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−275%
14−16
+275%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−150%
14−16
+150%
Hitman 3 8−9
−138%
18−20
+138%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−110%
21−24
+110%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
Battlefield 5 3
−700%
24−27
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 7
−143%
16−18
+143%
Far Cry New Dawn 6
−233%
20−22
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−190%
27−30
+190%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

This is how GTX 960M and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T2000 Mobile is 132% faster than GTX 960M in 900p
  • T2000 Mobile is 122% faster than GTX 960M in 1080p
  • T2000 Mobile is 133% faster than GTX 960M in 1440p
  • T2000 Mobile is 131% faster than GTX 960M in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 700% faster than the GTX 960M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, T2000 Mobile surpassed GTX 960M in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.78 20.63
Recency 12 March 2015 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 60 Watt

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 960M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 960M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GeForce GTX 960M
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 920 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 960M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 292 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.