GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs GTX 485M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 485M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 485M
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
6.12

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms GTX 485M by a whopping 230% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking579268
Place by popularitynot in top-10069
Power efficiency4.2728.17
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF104TU116
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2011 (13 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841024
Core clock speed1150 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate36.8095.04
Floating-point processing power0.8832 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 485M 6.12
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.21
+230%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 485M 2359
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+230%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 485M 2709
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266
+390%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 485M 13536
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517
+221%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p48
−213%
150−160
+213%
Full HD66
+13.8%
58
−13.8%
1440p12−14
−250%
42
+250%
4K8−9
−238%
27
+238%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−490%
59
+490%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−281%
61
+281%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−600%
49
+600%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−288%
65−70
+288%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−308%
53
+308%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−360%
46
+360%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−431%
69
+431%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−394%
84
+394%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−210%
120−130
+210%
Hitman 3 12−14
−325%
51
+325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−389%
181
+389%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−469%
91
+469%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−159%
44
+159%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−219%
65−70
+219%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−302%
201
+302%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−357%
32
+357%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−288%
65−70
+288%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−262%
47
+262%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−260%
36
+260%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−346%
58
+346%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−247%
59
+247%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−210%
120−130
+210%
Hitman 3 12−14
−317%
50
+317%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−386%
180
+386%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−394%
79
+394%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−129%
39
+129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−257%
75
+257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−266%
183
+266%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−68.8%
27
+68.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−114%
15
+114%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−138%
31
+138%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−240%
34
+240%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−200%
39
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−210%
120−130
+210%
Hitman 3 12−14
−258%
43
+258%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−73%
64
+73%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−200%
63
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−95%
39
+95%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+127%
22
−127%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−141%
41
+141%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−225%
35−40
+225%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−322%
38
+322%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−267%
21−24
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−433%
16
+433%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−271%
26
+271%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−528%
110−120
+528%
Hitman 3 10−11
−180%
28
+180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−215%
40−45
+215%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−208%
120
+208%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−200%
30−35
+200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−300%
20−22
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−400%
20
+400%
Hitman 3 2−3
−700%
16
+700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−180%
42
+180%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−633%
21−24
+633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1150%
25
+1150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 6
Far Cry 5 3−4
−300%
12
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−367%
27−30
+367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 21−24
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%

This is how GTX 485M and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 213% faster in 900p
  • GTX 485M is 14% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 250% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 238% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 485M is 127% faster.
  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 1950% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 485M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 69 tests (99%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.12 20.21
Recency 5 January 2011 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has a 230.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 485M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
GeForce GTX 485M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 485M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1635 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.