GeForce GTX 1630 vs GTX 460 768MB

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 460 768MB and GeForce GTX 1630, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 460 768MB
4.35

GTX 1630 outperforms GTX 460 768MB by a whopping 197% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking669388
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.91
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTU117
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)28 June 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336512
Core clock speed675 MHz1740 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data57.12
Floating-point processing powerno data1.828 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
−195%
130−140
+195%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−196%
80−85
+196%
Hitman 3 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−193%
85−90
+193%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−195%
130−140
+195%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−196%
80−85
+196%
Hitman 3 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−193%
85−90
+193%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−195%
130−140
+195%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−196%
80−85
+196%
Hitman 3 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−193%
85−90
+193%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−195%
130−140
+195%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Hitman 3 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−196%
80−85
+196%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Hitman 3 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%

This is how GTX 460 768MB and GTX 1630 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1630 is 195% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.35 12.92

GTX 1630 has a 197% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 1630 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 768MB in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
GeForce GTX 1630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 94 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 768MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1227 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.