Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

GTX 285M
1.68

UHD Graphics 630 outperforms GeForce GTX 285M by 83% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking891718
Place by popularitynot in top-10033
Value for money0.270.39
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Gen. 9.5 (2017)
GPU code nameN10E-GTX1Kaby-Lake-H-GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 March 2009 (15 years old)1 October 2017 (6 years old)
Current price$111 $457
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

UHD Graphics 630 has 44% better value for money than GTX 285M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12824
CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed576 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1150 MHz
Number of transistors754 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate38 billion/sec26.45
Floating-point performance384.0 gflops460.8 gflops
Gigaflops576no data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 285M and UHD Graphics 630 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP
SLI options2-wayno data
MXM TypeMXM 3.0 Type-Bno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 1020 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth61 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsSingle Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data
Quick Syncno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.1.103
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 285M 1.68
UHD Graphics 630 3.08
+83.3%

UHD Graphics 630 outperforms GeForce GTX 285M by 83% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 285M 650
UHD Graphics 630 1192
+83.4%

UHD Graphics 630 outperforms GeForce GTX 285M by 83% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 285M 6498
UHD Graphics 630 7704
+18.6%

UHD Graphics 630 outperforms GeForce GTX 285M by 19% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p21
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Full HD30
+76.5%
17
−76.5%
1440p5−6
−100%
10
+100%
4K3−4
−133%
7
+133%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5
+25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−600%
7
+600%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry 5 0−1 6
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Hitman 3 2−3
−300%
8
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−75%
7
+75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+33.3%
6
−33.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry 5 0−1 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Hitman 3 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−50%
3
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry 5 0−1 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hitman 3 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 0−1 1−2
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 1−2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

This is how GTX 285M and UHD Graphics 630 compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • UHD Graphics 630 is 66.7% faster than GTX 285M

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 285M is 76.5% faster than UHD Graphics 630

1440p resolution:

  • UHD Graphics 630 is 100% faster than GTX 285M

4K resolution:

  • UHD Graphics 630 is 133% faster than GTX 285M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 285M is 33.3% faster than the UHD Graphics 630.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 630 is 600% faster than the GTX 285M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 285M is ahead in 1 test (3%)
  • UHD Graphics 630 is ahead in 35 tests (92%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (5%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.68 3.08
Recency 2 March 2009 1 October 2017
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB System Shared
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt

The UHD Graphics 630 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 285M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 285M is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
GeForce GTX 285M
Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 3 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3316 votes

Rate Intel UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.