GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs GTX 285M

Place in the ranking	950	294
Place by popularity	not in top-100	18
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	G92	GA107
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 February 2010 (14 years ago)	17 December 2021 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	2048
CUDA cores	128	no data
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1185 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1477 MHz
Number of transistors	754 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	38.40	94.53
Floating-point processing power	0.384 TFLOPS	6.05 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	576	no data
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	64	64
Tensor Cores	no data	256
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8
SLI options	2-way	-
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	Up to 1020 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	61 GB/s	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Single Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
G-SYNC support	-	+
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management	8.0	no data
VR Ready	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.0	6.6
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	+	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 285M 1.65

RTX 2050 Mobile 18.62
+1028%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 285M 6498

RTX 2050 Mobile 46821
+621%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	21 −995%	230−240 +995%
Full HD	30 −46.7%	44 +46.7%
1440p	2−3 −1350%	29 +1350%
4K	2−3 −1450%	31 +1450%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−1125%

49
+1125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −600%	40−45 +600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −660%	35−40 +660%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −950%	42 +950%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2100%	40−45 +2100%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −1150%	50−55 +1150%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −2240%	110−120 +2240%
Hitman 3	6−7 −633%	44 +633%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −469%	90−95 +469%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −1567%	50−55 +1567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −578%	60−65 +578%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −159%	85−90 +159%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −600%	40−45 +600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −660%	35−40 +660%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −650%	30 +650%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2100%	40−45 +2100%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −1150%	50−55 +1150%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −2240%	110−120 +2240%
Hitman 3	6−7 −617%	43 +617%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −469%	90−95 +469%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −1567%	50−55 +1567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −589%	62 +589%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −250%	40−45 +250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −159%	85−90 +159%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −600%	40−45 +600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −660%	35−40 +660%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −525%	25 +525%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2100%	40−45 +2100%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −2240%	110−120 +2240%
Hitman 3	6−7 −550%	39 +550%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −469%	90−95 +469%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −511%	55 +511%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −175%	33 +175%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +88.9%	18 −88.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−1567%

50−55
+1567%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −1700%	35−40 +1700%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −1300%	27−30 +1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1800%	18−20 +1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1000%	21−24 +1000%
Hitman 3	7−8 −214%	21−24 +214%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −660%	35−40 +660%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −1133%	110−120 +1133%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−675%

30−35
+675%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−1300%

14−16
+1300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −450%	10−12 +450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	10−11
Far Cry 5	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	8−9

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−433%

16−18
+433%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	42 +0%	42 +0%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21 +0%	21 +0%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	47 +0%	47 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Hitman 3	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%

This is how GTX 285M and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2050 Mobile is 995% faster in 900p
RTX 2050 Mobile is 47% faster in 1080p
RTX 2050 Mobile is 1350% faster in 1440p
RTX 2050 Mobile is 1450% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 285M is 89% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 2240% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 285M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 50 tests (71%)
there's a draw in 19 tests (27%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.65	18.62
Recency	1 February 2010	17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	45 Watt

RTX 2050 Mobile has a 1028.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 712.5% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 285M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.