RTX A500 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 260M SLI and RTX A500 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 260M SLI
2009
2 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
3.30

RTX A500 Mobile outperforms GTX 260M SLI by a whopping 430% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking740311
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTXGA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 March 2009 (15 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2242048
Core clock speed550 MHzno data
Number of transistors1508 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt60 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rateno data98.37
Floating-point processing powerno data6.296 gflops
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7−8
−500%
42
+500%
1440p4−5
−550%
26
+550%
4K10−12
−440%
54
+440%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−750%
50−55
+750%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−343%
30−35
+343%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−500%
35−40
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−367%
40−45
+367%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−488%
100−105
+488%
Hitman 3 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−239%
75−80
+239%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1225%
50−55
+1225%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−438%
40−45
+438%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−292%
50−55
+292%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−100%
80−85
+100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−750%
50−55
+750%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−343%
30−35
+343%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−500%
35−40
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−367%
40−45
+367%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−488%
100−105
+488%
Hitman 3 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−239%
75−80
+239%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1225%
50−55
+1225%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−438%
40−45
+438%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−377%
62
+377%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−164%
35−40
+164%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−100%
80−85
+100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−343%
30−35
+343%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−500%
35−40
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−488%
100−105
+488%
Hitman 3 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−239%
75−80
+239%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−315%
54
+315%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−107%
29
+107%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−100%
80−85
+100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−438%
40−45
+438%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Hitman 3 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−400%
95−100
+400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−257%
24−27
+257%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39
+0%
39
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how GTX 260M SLI and RTX A500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A500 Mobile is 500% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A500 Mobile is 550% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A500 Mobile is 440% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX A500 Mobile is 2400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A500 Mobile is ahead in 62 tests (86%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.30 17.50
Recency 2 March 2009 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 60 Watt

RTX A500 Mobile has a 430.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 587.5% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The RTX A500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 260M SLI in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M SLI
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
RTX A500 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 74 votes

Rate RTX A500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.