Quadro FX 1500 vs GeForce GTX TITAN

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking253not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.24no data
Power efficiency5.89no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGK110G71
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date19 February 2013 (11 years ago)20 April 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 $699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2688no data
Core clock speed837 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed876 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate196.27.800
Floating-point processing power4.709 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4816
TMUs22424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mm173 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB256 MB
Memory bus width384-bit GDDR5256 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s625 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s40 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX TITAN 8200
+4752%
FX 1500 169

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 February 2013 20 April 2006
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 65 Watt

GTX TITAN has an age advantage of 6 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

FX 1500, on the other hand, has 284.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX TITAN and Quadro FX 1500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN is a desktop card while Quadro FX 1500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
GeForce GTX TITAN
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500
Quadro FX 1500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 158 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 32 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.