Radeon Pro Duo vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Place in performance ranking	147	240
Place by popularity	36	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	25.84	1.26
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	GCN 3.0 (2014−2017)
GPU code name	Turing TU116	Capsaicin
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Design	no data	reference
Release date	22 February 2019 (5 years ago)	26 April 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$279	$1,499
Current price	$284 (1x MSRP)	$4200 (2.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti has 1951% better value for money than Pro Duo.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	4096
Compute units	no data	128
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	1000 MHz
Number of transistors	6,600 million	8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	350 Watt
Texture fill rate	169.9	256.0
Floating-point performance	no data	2x 8,192 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	229 mm	277 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	3x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	512 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Eyefinity	no data	1
Number of Eyefinity displays	no data	6
HDMI	+	+
DisplayPort support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	no data	+
CrossFire	no data	1
Enduro	no data	+
FRTC	no data	1
FreeSync	no data	1
HD3D	no data	+
LiquidVR	no data	1
PowerTune	no data	+
TressFX	no data	1
TrueAudio	no data	+
ZeroCore	no data	+
UVD	no data	+
VCE	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	DirectX® 12
Shader Model	6.5	6.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
Mantle	no data	+
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti 33.47
+58.3%

Pro Duo 21.14

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro Duo by 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1660 Ti 12926
+58.3%

Pro Duo 8164

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro Duo by 58% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1660 Ti 16024

Pro Duo 27110
+69.2%

Radeon Pro Duo outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Ti by 69% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	104 +60%	65−70 −60%
1440p	57 +62.9%	35−40 −62.9%
4K	38 +58.3%	24−27 −58.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

120−130

+53.8%

78
−53.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +51.2%	86 −51.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	110−120 +48.6%	74 −48.6%
Battlefield 5	200−210 +53.8%	130 −53.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	150−160 +57.9%	95 −57.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +54.9%	71 −54.9%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +53.8%	104 −53.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	170−180 +51.8%	112 −51.8%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 +52.7%	131 −52.7%
Hitman 3	100−105 +44.9%	65−70 −44.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	280−290 +55.6%	180 −55.6%
Metro Exodus	210−220 +56.7%	134 −56.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	180−190 +51.3%	119 −51.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	240−250 +53.8%	156 −53.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 +49.4%	85−90 −49.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 +52.8%	72 −52.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85−90 +54.5%	55 −54.5%
Battlefield 5	190−200 +57%	121 −57%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	130−140 +52.9%	85 −52.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +57.9%	57 −57.9%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +46.3%	82 −46.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 +51.9%	79 −51.9%
Forza Horizon 4	300−310 +37.6%	218 −37.6%
Hitman 3	100−105 +44.9%	65−70 −44.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	210−220 +56.7%	130−140 −56.7%
Metro Exodus	160−170 +55.3%	103 −55.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	160−170 +55.3%	103 −55.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	200−210 +57.5%	127 −57.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	180−190 +55.2%	116 −55.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 +49.4%	85−90 −49.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +50.9%	53 −50.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	75−80 +50%	50 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +57.1%	70 −57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +52.2%	46 −52.2%
Far Cry 5	95−100 +55.7%	61 −55.7%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +54.6%	97 −54.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +56.9%	102 −56.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	170−180 +54.5%	110 −54.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95−100 +53.2%	62 −53.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 +49.4%	85−90 −49.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

150−160

+54.6%

97
−54.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +46.7%	75 −46.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 +46.3%	82 −46.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +46.3%	41 −46.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +52.8%	36 −52.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 +54.5%	55 −54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +48.1%	27 −48.1%
Far Cry 5	100−105 +49.3%	67 −49.3%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +55.8%	77 −55.8%
Hitman 3	65−70 +54.8%	40−45 −54.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +46.7%	75 −46.7%
Metro Exodus	100−105 +53.8%	65 −53.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 +53.8%	78 −53.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 +52.2%	45−50 −52.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +42.9%	27−30 −42.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

100−105

+53.8%

65
−53.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +52.8%	36 −52.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +55.2%	29 −55.2%
Hitman 3	40−45 +48.1%	27−30 −48.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +46.3%	40−45 −46.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +53.8%	26 −53.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +51.2%	43 −51.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +40%	25 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +57.9%	19 −57.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +40%	25 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +45.5%	11 −45.5%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +50%	20 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +56.9%	51 −56.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +54.8%	42 −54.8%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +57.1%	35 −57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70
+47.7%

−47.7%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti and Pro Duo compete in popular games:

GTX 1660 Ti is 60% faster in 1080p
GTX 1660 Ti is 63% faster in 1440p
GTX 1660 Ti is 58% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.47	21.14
Recency	22 February 2019	26 April 2016
Cost	$279	$1499
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	350 Watt