GeForce GTX 750 vs GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile with GeForce GTX 750, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
24.84
+233%

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile outperforms GTX 750 by a whopping 233% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking205507
Place by popularitynot in top-10075
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.003.96
Power efficiency24.7110.81
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameTU116GM107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)18 February 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 2425% better value for money than GTX 750.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536512
Core clock speed1455 MHz1020 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHz1085 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt55 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data95 °C
Texture fill rate152.634.72
Floating-point processing power4.884 TFLOPS1.111 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs9632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz5.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data3 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+
3D Vision Live-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA7.5+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 24.84
+233%
GTX 750 7.47

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 14818
+273%
GTX 750 3970

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD88
+267%
24−27
−267%
1440p58
+263%
16−18
−263%
4K36
+260%
10−12
−260%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.60
+90.5%
4.96
−90.5%
1440p3.95
+88.4%
7.44
−88.4%
4K6.36
+87.1%
11.90
−87.1%
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 91% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 88% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 87% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 109
+263%
30−33
−263%
Counter-Strike 2 147
+268%
40−45
−268%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+258%
24−27
−258%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 81
+238%
24−27
−238%
Battlefield 5 111
+270%
30−33
−270%
Counter-Strike 2 133
+280%
35−40
−280%
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+278%
18−20
−278%
Far Cry 5 93
+244%
27−30
−244%
Fortnite 120−130
+269%
35−40
−269%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+235%
40−45
−235%
Forza Horizon 5 100
+233%
30−33
−233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+257%
30−33
−257%
Valorant 209
+248%
60−65
−248%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 50
+257%
14−16
−257%
Battlefield 5 103
+243%
30−33
−243%
Counter-Strike 2 101
+237%
30−33
−237%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+234%
80−85
−234%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+238%
16−18
−238%
Dota 2 121
+246%
35−40
−246%
Far Cry 5 89
+271%
24−27
−271%
Fortnite 120−130
+269%
35−40
−269%
Forza Horizon 4 125
+257%
35−40
−257%
Forza Horizon 5 90
+233%
27−30
−233%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+250%
30−33
−250%
Metro Exodus 54
+238%
16−18
−238%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+257%
30−33
−257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+243%
30−33
−243%
Valorant 207
+245%
60−65
−245%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 94
+248%
27−30
−248%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+271%
14−16
−271%
Dota 2 116
+287%
30−33
−287%
Far Cry 5 83
+246%
24−27
−246%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+267%
27−30
−267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 109
+263%
30−33
−263%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+244%
16−18
−244%
Valorant 125
+257%
35−40
−257%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 107
+257%
30−33
−257%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+244%
18−20
−244%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+242%
55−60
−242%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+257%
14−16
−257%
Metro Exodus 30
+233%
9−10
−233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+250%
50−55
−250%
Valorant 197
+258%
55−60
−258%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 69
+283%
18−20
−283%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+257%
7−8
−257%
Far Cry 5 60
+233%
18−20
−233%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+238%
21−24
−238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+283%
12−14
−283%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 69
+283%
18−20
−283%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+250%
8−9
−250%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+271%
14−16
−271%
Metro Exodus 19
+280%
5−6
−280%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+250%
10−11
−250%
Valorant 152
+238%
45−50
−238%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 38
+280%
10−11
−280%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+250%
8−9
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+233%
3−4
−233%
Dota 2 85
+254%
24−27
−254%
Far Cry 5 31
+244%
9−10
−244%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+243%
14−16
−243%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+244%
9−10
−244%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and GTX 750 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 267% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 263% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 260% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.84 7.47
Recency 23 April 2019 18 February 2014
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 55 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has a 232.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 750, on the other hand, has 45.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 750 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 750 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GeForce GTX 750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1629 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2428 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile or GeForce GTX 750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.