GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs GTX 750

Place in the ranking	498	274
Place by popularity	87	62
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.52	no data
Power efficiency	10.86	27.92
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GM107	TU116
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	18 February 2014 (10 years ago)	23 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$119	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	1024
Core clock speed	1020 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1085 MHz	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	95 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	34.72	95.04
Floating-point processing power	1.111 TFLOPS	3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	32	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5.0 GB/s	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	3 displays	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D	+	-
3D Gaming	+	-
3D Vision	+	-
3D Vision Live	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.140
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 750 8.68

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.28
+134%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 750 3338

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+134%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 750 3970

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930
+150%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	24−27 −146%	59 +146%
1440p	18−20 −139%	43 +139%
4K	10−12 −150%	25 +150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	4.96	no data
1440p	6.61	no data
4K	11.90	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	42 +0%	42 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	59 +0%	59 +0%
Elden Ring	57 +0%	57 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	59 +0%	59 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	36 +0%	36 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 +0%	40 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	95 +0%	95 +0%
Metro Exodus	66 +0%	66 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 +0%	44 +0%
Valorant	98 +0%	98 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	30 +0%	30 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	32 +0%	32 +0%
Dota 2	90 +0%	90 +0%
Elden Ring	73 +0%	73 +0%
Far Cry 5	70 +0%	70 +0%
Fortnite	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	75 +0%	75 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	76 +0%	76 +0%
Metro Exodus	45 +0%	45 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	29 +0%	29 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Valorant	48 +0%	48 +0%
World of Tanks	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	52 +0%	52 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	29 +0%	29 +0%
Dota 2	112 +0%	112 +0%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	63 +0%	63 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Elden Ring	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	17 +0%	17 +0%
World of Tanks	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	41 +0%	41 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16 +0%	16 +0%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Valorant	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Dota 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Elden Ring	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	22 +0%	22 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 +0%	6 +0%
Dota 2	52 +0%	52 +0%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Fortnite	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

This is how GTX 750 and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 146% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 139% faster in 1440p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 150% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.68	20.28
Recency	18 February 2014	23 April 2020
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	50 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has a 133.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 10% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 750 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 750 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.