Arc A770M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and Arc A770M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
28.91

Arc A770M outperforms GTX 1660 Ti Mobile by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking196182
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.00no data
Power efficiency24.9317.78
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTU116DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15364096
Core clock speed1455 MHz1650 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate152.6524.8
Floating-point processing power4.884 TFLOPS16.79 TFLOPS
ROPs48128
TMUs96256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 28.91
Arc A770M 30.92
+7%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 20119
Arc A770M 37375
+85.8%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 49309
Arc A770M 77403
+57%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 14818
Arc A770M 25563
+72.5%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 97517
Arc A770M 124487
+27.7%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 5659
Arc A770M 10783
+90.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD89
−6.7%
95
+6.7%
1440p57
+5.6%
54
−5.6%
4K36
−8.3%
39
+8.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.57no data
1440p4.02no data
4K6.36no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 63
+5%
60−65
−5%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
−31.4%
113
+31.4%
Elden Ring 95−100
+56.5%
62
−56.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 89
−1.1%
90−95
+1.1%
Counter-Strike 2 54
−11.1%
60−65
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+31.3%
48
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 147
−74.1%
256
+74.1%
Metro Exodus 88
−13.6%
100
+13.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 99
+54.7%
60−65
−54.7%
Valorant 148
+20.3%
120−130
−20.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 112
+24.4%
90−95
−24.4%
Counter-Strike 2 49
−22.4%
60−65
+22.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+28.2%
39
−28.2%
Dota 2 111
+91.4%
58
−91.4%
Elden Ring 102
−2.9%
100−110
+2.9%
Far Cry 5 75
+33.9%
56
−33.9%
Fortnite 130−140
−5%
140−150
+5%
Forza Horizon 4 118
−78.8%
211
+78.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+22.1%
86
−22.1%
Metro Exodus 63
−30.2%
82
+30.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 232
+29.6%
170−180
−29.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 41
−56.1%
60−65
+56.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
−8.3%
100−110
+8.3%
Valorant 71
−73.2%
120−130
+73.2%
World of Tanks 270−280
−1.5%
270−280
+1.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 78
−15.4%
90−95
+15.4%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−7.1%
60−65
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+36.4%
33
−36.4%
Dota 2 116
+13.7%
100−110
−13.7%
Far Cry 5 119
+38.4%
85−90
−38.4%
Forza Horizon 4 101
−77.2%
179
+77.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−4.1%
170−180
+4.1%
Valorant 125
+1.6%
120−130
−1.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 50−55
−8%
50−55
+8%
Elden Ring 54
−7.4%
55−60
+7.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 26
−11.5%
27−30
+11.5%
World of Tanks 180−190
−6.4%
200−210
+6.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55
−9.1%
60−65
+9.1%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−7.7%
27−30
+7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+13.6%
22
−13.6%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−9.1%
95−100
+9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−7.6%
85−90
+7.6%
Metro Exodus 60
−15%
65−70
+15%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−8.9%
45−50
+8.9%
Valorant 81
−9.9%
85−90
+9.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Dota 2 50−55
+15.6%
45
−15.6%
Elden Ring 26
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+15.6%
45
−15.6%
Metro Exodus 19
−94.7%
37
+94.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90
−7.8%
95−100
+7.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 17
−17.6%
20−22
+17.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+15.6%
45
−15.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27
−25.9%
30−35
+25.9%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−10%
11
+10%
Dota 2 85
+51.8%
55−60
−51.8%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−10.3%
40−45
+10.3%
Fortnite 37
−10.8%
40−45
+10.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−64.4%
74
+64.4%
Valorant 39
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and Arc A770M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770M is 7% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 6% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770M is 8% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 91% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A770M is 95% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is ahead in 20 tests (32%)
  • Arc A770M is ahead in 42 tests (67%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.91 30.92
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 120 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 50% lower power consumption.

Arc A770M, on the other hand, has a 7% higher aggregate performance score, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and Arc A770M.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Intel Arc A770M
Arc A770M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1599 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 90 votes

Rate Arc A770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.