UHD Graphics 750 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Place in performance ranking	227	624
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	16.08	2.10
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code name	N18E-G0	Rocket Lake GT1
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	23 April 2019 (5 years ago)	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$229	no data
Current price	$1037 (4.5x MSRP)	$1454

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 666% better value for money than UHD Graphics 750.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	256
Core clock speed	1140 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1335 MHz	1300 MHz
Number of transistors	6,600 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	128.2	20.80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and UHD Graphics 750 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	192 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 22.82
+408%

UHD Graphics 750 4.49

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by 408% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 8814
+409%

UHD Graphics 750 1733

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by 409% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	81 +479%	14−16 −479%
4K	32 +433%	6−7 −433%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

180−190

+386%

35−40
−386%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +400%	10−12 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +400%	10−11 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	180−190 +386%	35−40 −386%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +400%	12−14 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 +376%	21−24 −376%
Hitman 3	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +400%	24−27 −400%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +400%	12−14 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +400%	16−18 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 +376%	21−24 −376%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +400%	10−12 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +400%	10−11 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	180−190 +386%	35−40 −386%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +400%	12−14 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 +376%	21−24 −376%
Hitman 3	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +400%	24−27 −400%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +400%	12−14 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +400%	16−18 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +400%	10−11 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 +376%	21−24 −376%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +400%	10−11 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	180−190 +386%	35−40 −386%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 +376%	21−24 −376%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +400%	24−27 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +400%	16−18 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +400%	10−11 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 +376%	21−24 −376%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
+400%

12−14

−400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +400%	8−9 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	110−120 +400%	21−24 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +400%	14−16 −400%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Hitman 3	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +400%	10−11 −400%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	240−250 +390%	45−50 −390%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

+400%

8−9
−400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Hitman 3	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%