GeForce GTX 1630 vs UHD Graphics 750

Place in performance ranking	624	364
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.10	12.70
Architecture	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Rocket Lake GT1	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)	28 June 2022 (1 year ago)
Current price	$1454	$213

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1630 has 505% better value for money than UHD Graphics 750.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	512
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.80	57.12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics 750 and GeForce GTX 1630 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	no data	145 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	no data	96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 750 4.48

GTX 1630 12.90
+188%

GeForce GTX 1630 outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by 188% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

UHD Graphics 750 1733

GTX 1630 4991
+188%

GeForce GTX 1630 outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by 188% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Battlefield 5	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%
Hitman 3	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Battlefield 5	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%
Hitman 3	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−150%

30−33
+150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Hitman 3	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Hitman 3	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
−180%

14−16

+180%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.48	12.90
Recency	30 March 2021	28 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt