GeForce GTX 1630 vs UHD Graphics 750

Place in the ranking	661	391
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	20.75	11.95
Architecture	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Rocket Lake GT1	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)	28 June 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	512
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1740 MHz
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.80	57.12
Floating-point processing power	0.6656 TFLOPS	1.828 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	16
TMUs	16	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	145 mm
Width	IGP	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 750 4.51

GTX 1630 12.99
+188%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 750 1733

GTX 1630 4995
+188%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Elden Ring	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
Valorant	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Dota 2	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
Elden Ring	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Fortnite	24−27 −169%	70−75 +169%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −182%	110−120 +182%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Valorant	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
World of Tanks	75−80 −180%	210−220 +180%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −182%	110−120 +182%
Valorant	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Elden Ring	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−33 −183%	85−90 +183%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
World of Tanks	30−35 −181%	90−95 +181%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Valorant	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%
Elden Ring	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Fortnite	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Valorant	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.51	12.99
Recency	30 March 2021	28 June 2022
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt

UHD Graphics 750 has 400% lower power consumption.

GTX 1630, on the other hand, has a 188% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1630 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.