Radeon RX 7900M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Super

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 1660 Super
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
33.07

Radeon RX 7900M outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Super by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking14833
Place by popularity8not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.60no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)RDNA 3
GPU code nameTuring TU116Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 October 2019 (4 years ago)19 October 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data
Current price$277 (1.2x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14084608
Core clock speed1530 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz2090 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt180 Watt (160 - 200 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate157.1601.9

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1660 Super and Radeon RX 7900M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

NVENC+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Super 33.07
RX 7900M 57.64
+74.3%

Radeon RX 7900M outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Super by 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1660 Super 12772
RX 7900M 22261
+74.3%

Radeon RX 7900M outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Super by 74% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1660 Super 21982
RX 7900M 59943
+173%

Radeon RX 7900M outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Super by 173% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1660 Super 15829
RX 7900M 50241
+217%

Radeon RX 7900M outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Super by 217% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90
−61.1%
145
+61.1%
1440p54
−96.3%
106
+96.3%
4K30
−153%
76
+153%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 76
−71.1%
130−140
+71.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 88 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66 no data
Battlefield 5 100−110 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 63
−58.7%
100−105
+58.7%
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 121 no data
Forza Horizon 4 144 no data
Hitman 3 77 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 186 no data
Metro Exodus 144 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 80 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 163 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 83 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 73 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48 no data
Battlefield 5 100−110 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 72 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 52
−73.1%
90−95
+73.1%
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 86 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Hitman 3 63 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 290 no data
Metro Exodus 111 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 64 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 113 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 208 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 51 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 44 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 49
−73.5%
85−90
+73.5%
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 107 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 99 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 112 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 31 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 57 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 82 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 34 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 53 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 26
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%
Far Cry 5 65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 84 no data
Hitman 3 43 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 71 no data
Metro Exodus 67 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 56 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 31 no data
Hitman 3 25 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 19 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 54 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40 no data
Metro Exodus 35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 12 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 28 no data

This is how GTX 1660 Super and RX 7900M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900M is 61% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900M is 96% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900M is 153% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.07 57.64
Recency 29 October 2019 19 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 180 Watt

The Radeon RX 7900M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 Super in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Super is a desktop card while Radeon RX 7900M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
GeForce GTX 1660 Super
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 17912 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 47 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.