Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and Iris Xe Graphics G7, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1650 Mobile
2019
4 GB GDDR5, GDDR6, 50 Watt
18.43
+72.1%

GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking282397
Place by popularity6317
Cost-effectiveness evaluation40.33no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameN18P-G0, N18P-G61Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)15 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$301 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102496
Core clock speed1380 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate99.84no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and Iris Xe Graphics G7 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5, GDDR6DDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed12000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.140no data
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Mobile 18.43
+72.1%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 10.71

GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1650 Mobile 13132
+95.7%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 6710

GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by 96% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1650 Mobile 9313
+93.2%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 4820

GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by 93% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1650 Mobile 57365
+50.8%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 38040

GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by 51% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
+90%
30−35
−90%
1440p37
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
4K23
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 52
+73.3%
30−33
−73.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+75%
24−27
−75%
Battlefield 5 81 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 51 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+95.2%
21−24
−95.2%
Far Cry 5 66 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 79 no data
Forza Horizon 4 82 no data
Hitman 3 47
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 104 no data
Metro Exodus 82
+82.2%
45−50
−82.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 71 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 79 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 48
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
+100%
12−14
−100%
Battlefield 5 70 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+77.8%
18−20
−77.8%
Far Cry 5 53 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 54 no data
Forza Horizon 4 148 no data
Hitman 3 39
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 148 no data
Metro Exodus 61 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 61 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 141
+76.3%
80−85
−76.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8
+100%
4−5
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 34
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Far Cry 5 40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 62 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 57
+90%
30−33
−90%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 17
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 52
+73.3%
30−33
−73.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 43
+79.2%
24−27
−79.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 48
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 26
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Far Cry 5 35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Hitman 3 26
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 44
+83.3%
24−27
−83.3%
Metro Exodus 39
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
+100%
6−7
−100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21
+75%
12−14
−75%
Far Cry New Dawn 17
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Hitman 3 14
+75%
8−9
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 15 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 23
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Metro Exodus 19
+90%
10−11
−90%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%

This is how GTX 1650 Mobile and Iris Xe Graphics G7 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Mobile is 90% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Mobile is 76% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Mobile is 92% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.43 10.71
Recency 23 April 2019 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm

The GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 3051 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2198 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.