GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Place in performance ranking	259	29
Place by popularity	83	21
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	18.28	40.20
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	N18P-G62	AD106
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399
Current price	$892	$461 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4060 Ti has 120% better value for money than GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	4352
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1485 MHz	2535 MHz
Number of transistors	6,600 million	22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)	160 Watt
Texture fill rate	95.04	344.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	240 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.140	1.3
CUDA	7.5	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.16

RTX 4060 Ti 59.23
+194%

RTX 4060 Ti outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Mobile by 194% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796

RTX 4060 Ti 22900
+194%

RTX 4060 Ti outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Mobile by 194% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	58 −193%	170−180 +193%
1440p	44 −173%	120−130 +173%
4K	27 −178%	75−80 +178%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

59
−188%

170−180

+188%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	61 −179%	170−180 +179%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	49 −186%	140−150 +186%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −188%	190−200 +188%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	53 −183%	150−160 +183%
Cyberpunk 2077	46 −183%	130−140 +183%
Far Cry 5	69 −190%	200−210 +190%
Far Cry New Dawn	84 −186%	240−250 +186%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −188%	190−200 +188%
Hitman 3	83 −189%	240−250 +189%
Horizon Zero Dawn	115 −161%	300−310 +161%
Metro Exodus	91 −186%	260−270 +186%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 −173%	120−130 +173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95 −184%	270−280 +184%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60 −183%	170−180 +183%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	46 −183%	130−140 +183%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	32 −181%	90−95 +181%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −188%	190−200 +188%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	64 −181%	180−190 +181%
Cyberpunk 2077	36 −178%	100−105 +178%
Far Cry 5	70 −186%	200−210 +186%
Far Cry New Dawn	59 −188%	170−180 +188%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −188%	190−200 +188%
Hitman 3	45 −189%	130−140 +189%
Horizon Zero Dawn	91 −186%	260−270 +186%
Metro Exodus	62 −190%	180−190 +190%
Red Dead Redemption 2	42 −186%	120−130 +186%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	62 −190%	180−190 +190%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	72 −192%	210−220 +192%
Watch Dogs: Legion	52 −188%	150−160 +188%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27 −178%	75−80 +178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	15 −167%	40−45 +167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	31 −190%	90−95 +190%
Cyberpunk 2077	34 −179%	95−100 +179%
Far Cry 5	39 −182%	110−120 +182%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −188%	190−200 +188%
Horizon Zero Dawn	64 −181%	180−190 +181%
Metro Exodus	57 −181%	160−170 +181%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	39 −182%	110−120 +182%
Watch Dogs: Legion	22 −173%	60−65 +173%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

41
−193%

120−130

+193%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −182%	110−120 +182%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −175%	110−120 +175%
Hitman 3	27 −178%	75−80 +178%
Red Dead Redemption 2	17 −165%	45−50 +165%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −186%	60−65 +186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −189%	55−60 +189%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −188%	75−80 +188%
Cyberpunk 2077	16 −181%	45−50 +181%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −179%	95−100 +179%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −182%	110−120 +182%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −193%	120−130 +193%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −189%	110−120 +189%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −193%	120−130 +193%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	46 −183%	130−140 +183%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −173%	60−65 +173%
Hitman 3	16 −181%	45−50 +181%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −173%	60−65 +173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18 −178%	50−55 +178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 −180%	70−75 +180%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −192%	35−40 +192%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Battlefield 5	28 −186%	80−85 +186%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 −167%	16−18 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −178%	75−80 +178%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −173%	60−65 +173%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −189%	55−60 +189%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−178%

50−55
+178%

This is how GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and RTX 4060 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 4060 Ti is 193% faster in 1080p
RTX 4060 Ti is 173% faster in 1440p
RTX 4060 Ti is 178% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	20.16	59.23
Recency	2 April 2020	18 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	160 Watt