RTX 2050 Mobile vs GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
20.11
+8.5%

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms RTX 2050 Mobile by 8% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking255277
Place by popularity7627
Value for money18.01no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN18P-G62GN20-S7
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 April 2020 (3 years old)17 December 2021 (2 years old)
Current price$892 no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242048
Core clock speed1350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1485 MHz1477 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)30-45 Watt
Texture fill rate95.04189.1

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+
G-SYNC supportno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.2
CUDA7.58.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.11
+8.5%
RTX 2050 Mobile 18.54

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms RTX 2050 Mobile by 8% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517
RTX 2050 Mobile 46821
+7.6%

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Mobile by 8% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266
+8.8%
RTX 2050 Mobile 12195

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms RTX 2050 Mobile by 9% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930
+12.6%
RTX 2050 Mobile 8815

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms RTX 2050 Mobile by 13% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 65163
+12.2%
RTX 2050 Mobile 58068

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms RTX 2050 Mobile by 12% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
+40.5%
42
−40.5%
1440p44
+41.9%
31
−41.9%
4K24
−16.7%
28
+16.7%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 59
+20.4%
49
−20.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 61
+60.5%
35−40
−60.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 49
+16.7%
42
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 84
+33.3%
60−65
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 71
+47.9%
45−50
−47.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+9.5%
42
−9.5%
Far Cry 5 67
+13.6%
59
−13.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 66
+32%
50−55
−32%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+7.8%
60−65
−7.8%
Hitman 3 83
+22.1%
68
−22.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 62
+59%
35−40
−59%
Red Dead Redemption 2 54
+74.2%
30−35
−74.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65
+66.7%
35−40
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60
+30.4%
46
−30.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 46
+21.1%
35−40
−21.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
+52.4%
21
−52.4%
Battlefield 5 73
+15.9%
60−65
−15.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 58
+20.8%
45−50
−20.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+20%
30
−20%
Far Cry 5 62
+17%
53
−17%
Far Cry New Dawn 62
+24%
50−55
−24%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+7.8%
60−65
−7.8%
Hitman 3 67
+19.6%
56
−19.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 47
+20.5%
35−40
−20.5%
Metro Exodus 38
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 29
−6.9%
30−35
+6.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
+35.9%
35−40
−35.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+24.1%
58
−24.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 52
+33.3%
39
−33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27
−40.7%
35−40
+40.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 15
+114%
7
−114%
Battlefield 5 67
+6.3%
60−65
−6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+36%
25
−36%
Far Cry 5 58
+18.4%
49
−18.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 57
+14%
50−55
−14%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+7.8%
60−65
−7.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+14.7%
34
−14.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 22
+22.2%
18
−22.2%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 37
+32.1%
27−30
−32.1%
Hitman 3 39
+30%
30−33
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+8%
24−27
−8%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+10%
20−22
−10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
Battlefield 5 51
+24.4%
40−45
−24.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−8.8%
37
+8.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+10.8%
35−40
−10.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+10%
20−22
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 19
+46.2%
12−14
−46.2%
Hitman 3 21
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
+50%
12−14
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+31.6%
18−20
−31.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Battlefield 5 28
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−12.5%
18
+12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+7.7%
24−27
−7.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

This is how GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 40.5% faster than RTX 2050 Mobile

1440p resolution:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 41.9% faster than RTX 2050 Mobile

4K resolution:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 16.7% faster than GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 114% faster than the RTX 2050 Mobile.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 40.7% faster than the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 64 tests (94%)
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 4 tests (6%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 20.11 18.54
Recency 2 April 2020 17 December 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 30 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1361 vote

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1324 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.