Radeon Vega 7 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and Radeon Vega 7, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
2020
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
20.16
+171%

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Vega 7 by a whopping 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking281540
Place by popularity8310
Power efficiency27.8211.39
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU116Cezanne
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 April 2020 (4 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024448
Core clock speed1350 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1485 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate95.0453.20
Floating-point processing power3.041 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs6428

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1401.2
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.16
+171%
Vega 7 7.43

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266
+153%
Vega 7 5249

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930
+197%
Vega 7 3348

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 65163
+164%
Vega 7 24726

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 3618
+251%
Vega 7 1032

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD61
+154%
24
−154%
1440p46
+84%
25
−84%
4K27
+50%
18
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 76
+347%
16−18
−347%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+200%
14−16
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+228%
18
−228%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 56
+229%
16−18
−229%
Battlefield 5 84
+200%
28
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 36
+157%
14−16
−157%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+229%
14
−229%
Far Cry 5 67
+235%
20
−235%
Fortnite 121
+92.1%
63
−92.1%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+108%
37
−108%
Forza Horizon 5 68
+278%
18
−278%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+188%
24−27
−188%
Valorant 181
+141%
75−80
−141%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 34
+100%
16−18
−100%
Battlefield 5 73
+217%
23
−217%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+114%
14−16
−114%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+297%
58
−297%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+260%
10
−260%
Dota 2 119
+198%
40−45
−198%
Far Cry 5 62
+244%
18
−244%
Fortnite 90
+233%
27
−233%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+120%
35
−120%
Forza Horizon 5 45
+165%
16−18
−165%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+347%
17
−347%
Metro Exodus 38
+192%
13
−192%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+213%
23
−213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+279%
19
−279%
Valorant 180
+147%
73
−147%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 67
+219%
21
−219%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+157%
14−16
−157%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+278%
9
−278%
Dota 2 112
+180%
40−45
−180%
Far Cry 5 58
+222%
18
−222%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+185%
27
−185%
Forza Horizon 5 47
+292%
12
−292%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+188%
24−27
−188%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+200%
13
−200%
Valorant 140−150
+468%
25
−468%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 69
+393%
14
−393%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+154%
50−55
−154%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+267%
9−10
−267%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+257%
7−8
−257%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+338%
35−40
−338%
Valorant 164
+242%
48
−242%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 51
+292%
12−14
−292%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+167%
6−7
−167%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+207%
14−16
−207%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+182%
16−18
−182%
Forza Horizon 5 28
+133%
12−14
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+182%
10−12
−182%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 41
+193%
14−16
−193%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+400%
5−6
−400%
Valorant 84
+236%
25
−236%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 28
+367%
6−7
−367%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+200%
2−3
−200%
Dota 2 52
+189%
18−20
−189%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+200%
10−12
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 14
+180%
5−6
−180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 13
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%

This is how GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 154% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 84% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1650 Ti Mobile surpassed Vega 7 in all 64 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.16 7.43
Recency 23 April 2020 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 45 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has a 171.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Vega 7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1735 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2395 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile or Radeon Vega 7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.