Radeon Pro W6600M vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER with Radeon Pro W6600M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1650 SUPER
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
25.45

Pro W6600M outperforms GTX 1650 SUPER by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking225220
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Power efficiency18.0020.51
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU116Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date22 November 2019 (5 years ago)8 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801792
Core clock speed1530 MHz1224 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz2034 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate138.0227.8
Floating-point processing power4.416 TFLOPS7.29 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs80112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1650 SUPER 25.45
Pro W6600M 26.10
+2.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 SUPER 10168
Pro W6600M 10427
+2.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD68
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%
1440p35
+0%
35−40
+0%
4K21
+0%
21−24
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 248
+69.9%
140−150
−69.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+14.5%
55−60
−14.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 72
+35.8%
50−55
−35.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 72
−37.5%
95−100
+37.5%
Counter-Strike 2 201
+37.7%
140−150
−37.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
−10%
55−60
+10%
Far Cry 5 93
+10.7%
80−85
−10.7%
Fortnite 120−130
−1.7%
120−130
+1.7%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−3.1%
100−110
+3.1%
Forza Horizon 5 93
+14.8%
80−85
−14.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 54
+1.9%
50−55
−1.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−3.1%
100−105
+3.1%
Valorant 160−170
−1.8%
170−180
+1.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 58
−70.7%
95−100
+70.7%
Counter-Strike 2 96
−52.1%
140−150
+52.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
−1.2%
260−270
+1.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Dota 2 209
+67.2%
120−130
−67.2%
Far Cry 5 86
+2.4%
80−85
−2.4%
Fortnite 120−130
−1.7%
120−130
+1.7%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−3.1%
100−110
+3.1%
Forza Horizon 5 82
+1.2%
80−85
−1.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 103
+12%
90−95
−12%
Hogwarts Legacy 41
−29.3%
50−55
+29.3%
Metro Exodus 51
−9.8%
55−60
+9.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−3.1%
100−105
+3.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
+16.9%
75−80
−16.9%
Valorant 160−170
−1.8%
170−180
+1.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 57
−73.7%
95−100
+73.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
Dota 2 191
+52.8%
120−130
−52.8%
Far Cry 5 79
−6.3%
80−85
+6.3%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−3.1%
100−110
+3.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 33
−60.6%
50−55
+60.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−3.1%
100−105
+3.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
−54%
75−80
+54%
Valorant 160−170
−1.8%
170−180
+1.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 120−130
−1.7%
120−130
+1.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 52
−9.6%
55−60
+9.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
−2.3%
170−180
+2.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
−4.4%
45−50
+4.4%
Metro Exodus 29
−17.2%
30−35
+17.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 200−210
−1.4%
210−220
+1.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
−66.7%
70−75
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
−30%
24−27
+30%
Far Cry 5 54
−7.4%
55−60
+7.4%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−3.1%
65−70
+3.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 22
−27.3%
27−30
+27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−2.4%
40−45
+2.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10
−160%
24−27
+160%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
−6.7%
45−50
+6.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 16
−37.5%
21−24
+37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
−18.8%
35−40
+18.8%
Valorant 140−150
−2.8%
140−150
+2.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24
−62.5%
35−40
+62.5%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−4%
24−27
+4%
Cyberpunk 2077 3
−267%
10−12
+267%
Dota 2 80
−2.5%
80−85
+2.5%
Far Cry 5 24
−20.8%
27−30
+20.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 7
−129%
16−18
+129%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%

This is how GTX 1650 SUPER and Pro W6600M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 5% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GTX 1650 SUPER is 70% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro W6600M is 267% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 SUPER is ahead in 13 tests (20%)
  • Pro W6600M is ahead in 50 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.45 26.10
Recency 22 November 2019 8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 90 Watt

Pro W6600M has a 2.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon Pro W6600M.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop card while Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4994 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER or Radeon Pro W6600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.