Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile and Radeon R9 M395X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1080 Mobile
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
35.65
+164%

GTX 1080 Mobile outperforms R9 M395X by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking139381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation42.95no data
Power efficiency16.4012.43
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGP104Amethyst
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2016 (8 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed1607 MHz723 MHz
Boost clock speed1771 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt250 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate283.492.54
Floating-point processing power9.068 TFLOPS2.961 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs160128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed10 GB/s1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
Eyefinity-+
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+
GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.2Not Listed
Vulkan1.2.131-
Mantle-+
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1080 Mobile 35.65
+164%
R9 M395X 13.51

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1080 Mobile 21394
+170%
R9 M395X 7921

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD114
+185%
40−45
−185%
1440p70
+192%
24−27
−192%
4K56
+167%
21−24
−167%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.39no data
1440p7.14no data
4K8.93no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+204%
24−27
−204%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+188%
24−27
−188%
Elden Ring 120−130
+200%
40−45
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 57
+29.5%
40−45
−29.5%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+204%
24−27
−204%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+23.1%
24−27
−23.1%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+213%
50−55
−213%
Metro Exodus 89
+141%
35−40
−141%
Red Dead Redemption 2 92
+171%
30−35
−171%
Valorant 156
+194%
50−55
−194%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 103
+134%
40−45
−134%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+204%
24−27
−204%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Dota 2 79
+61.2%
45−50
−61.2%
Elden Ring 120−130
+200%
40−45
−200%
Far Cry 5 67
+31.4%
50−55
−31.4%
Fortnite 160
+111%
75−80
−111%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+213%
50−55
−213%
Grand Theft Auto V 119
+148%
45−50
−148%
Metro Exodus 71
+91.9%
35−40
−91.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 118
+19.2%
95−100
−19.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 51
+50%
30−35
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 131
+220%
40−45
−220%
Valorant 94
+77.4%
50−55
−77.4%
World of Tanks 270−280
+55%
180−190
−55%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 53
+20.5%
40−45
−20.5%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+204%
24−27
−204%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
−13%
24−27
+13%
Dota 2 120
+145%
45−50
−145%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+82.4%
50−55
−82.4%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+213%
50−55
−213%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 101
+2%
95−100
−2%
Valorant 137
+158%
50−55
−158%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 65−70
+242%
18−20
−242%
Elden Ring 70−75
+250%
20−22
−250%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+242%
18−20
−242%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+68.3%
100−110
−68.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 32
+167%
12−14
−167%
World of Tanks 220−230
+139%
95−100
−139%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 53
+96.3%
27−30
−96.3%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+183%
12−14
−183%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+256%
30−35
−256%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+216%
30−35
−216%
Metro Exodus 74
+155%
27−30
−155%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+253%
16−18
−253%
Valorant 94
+185%
30−35
−185%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%
Dota 2 76
+217%
24−27
−217%
Elden Ring 30−35
+267%
9−10
−267%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+217%
24−27
−217%
Metro Exodus 27
+200%
9−10
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110
+175%
40−45
−175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20
+122%
9−10
−122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+217%
24−27
−217%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
+250%
12−14
−250%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+50%
4−5
−50%
Dota 2 65−70
+183%
24−27
−183%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+200%
16−18
−200%
Fortnite 51
+240%
14−16
−240%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+222%
18−20
−222%
Valorant 50
+257%
14−16
−257%

This is how GTX 1080 Mobile and R9 M395X compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Mobile is 185% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile is 192% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile is 167% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1080 Mobile is 300% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M395X is 13% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Mobile is ahead in 62 tests (98%)
  • R9 M395X is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.65 13.51
Recency 15 August 2016 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 1080 Mobile has a 163.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M395X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
AMD Radeon R9 M395X
Radeon R9 M395X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 331 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 15 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M395X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.