Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and Radeon R9 M395X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
15.26
+13%

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile outperforms R9 M395X by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking348381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.0412.43
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGP107Amethyst
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2017 (8 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed1493 MHz723 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt250 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate77.7692.54
Floating-point processing power2.488 TFLOPS2.961 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs48128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7 GB/s1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity-+
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.2Not Listed
Vulkan1.2.131-
Mantle-+
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 15.26
+13%
R9 M395X 13.51

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 7741
R9 M395X 7921
+2.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%
1440p25
+19%
21−24
−19%
4K17
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+34.1%
40−45
−34.1%
Far Cry 5 47
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Fortnite 85−90
+13.3%
75−80
−13.3%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+14.8%
50−55
−14.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 56
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
−3%
30−35
+3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 49
+11.4%
40−45
−11.4%
Dota 2 92
+87.8%
45−50
−87.8%
Far Cry 5 44
−15.9%
50−55
+15.9%
Fortnite 76
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+5.6%
50−55
−5.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 55
+14.6%
45−50
−14.6%
Metro Exodus 19
−94.7%
35−40
+94.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 52
−90.4%
95−100
+90.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+8.8%
30−35
−8.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+14.6%
40−45
−14.6%
World of Tanks 190−200
+8.9%
180−190
−8.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
−4.8%
40−45
+4.8%
Dota 2 86
+75.5%
45−50
−75.5%
Far Cry 5 40
−27.5%
50−55
+27.5%
Forza Horizon 4 43
−25.6%
50−55
+25.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39
−154%
95−100
+154%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 54
+20%
45−50
−20%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+21.1%
18−20
−21.1%
Metro Exodus 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Far Cry 5 26
−23.1%
30−35
+23.1%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+15.6%
30−35
−15.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 32
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Metro Exodus 7
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Dota 2 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 12
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Elden Ring 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Elden Ring 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Elden Ring 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
World of Tanks 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Elden Ring 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and R9 M395X compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 24% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 19% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 21% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 88% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M395X is 154% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 19 tests (30%)
  • R9 M395X is ahead in 12 tests (19%)
  • there's a draw in 32 tests (51%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.26 13.51
Recency 3 January 2017 5 May 2015
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile has a 13% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M395X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
AMD Radeon R9 M395X
Radeon R9 M395X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 855 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 15 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M395X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.