Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q MX150 GP107 MX350
VS
Radeon E8950 Radeon R9 M295X Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M390X Radeon R9 M395X Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M485X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and Radeon R9 M395X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
15.07
+12.9%

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile outperforms R9 M395X by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti
R9 M395X R9 M395X

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking358391
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.9412.34
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGP107Amethyst
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2017 (8 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed1493 MHz723 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt250 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate77.7692.54
Floating-point processing power2.488 TFLOPS2.961 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs48128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7 GB/s1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity-+
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+
Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.2Not Listed
Vulkan1.2.131-
Mantle-+
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 15.07
+12.9%
R9 M395X 13.35

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 7741
R9 M395X 7921
+2.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
+24.4%
45−50
−24.4%
1440p25
+19%
21−24
−19%
4K17
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
Far Cry 5 47
+9.3%
40−45
−9.3%
Fortnite 80−85
+11%
70−75
−11%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+14.8%
50−55
−14.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 56
+21.7%
45−50
−21.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 49
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 124
−43.5%
170−180
+43.5%
Dota 2 92
+9.5%
80−85
−9.5%
Far Cry 5 44
+2.3%
40−45
−2.3%
Fortnite 76
+4.1%
70−75
−4.1%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+5.6%
50−55
−5.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 55
+14.6%
45−50
−14.6%
Metro Exodus 19
−36.8%
24−27
+36.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 52
+13%
45−50
−13%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+38.2%
30−35
−38.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
−31%
55−60
+31%
Dota 2 86
+2.4%
80−85
−2.4%
Far Cry 5 40
−7.5%
40−45
+7.5%
Forza Horizon 4 43
−25.6%
50−55
+25.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39
−17.9%
45−50
+17.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
−30.8%
30−35
+30.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 54
−35.2%
70−75
+35.2%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+11.6%
95−100
−11.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+15%
20−22
−15%
Metro Exodus 12
−25%
14−16
+25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 29
−17.2%
30−35
+17.2%
Far Cry 5 26
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+12.9%
30−35
−12.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 32
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Metro Exodus 7
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Dota 2 50−55
+10.9%
45−50
−10.9%
Far Cry 5 12
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+13.6%
21−24
−13.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and R9 M395X compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 24% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 19% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 21% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 38% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M395X is 44% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 23 tests (34%)
  • R9 M395X is ahead in 15 tests (22%)
  • there's a draw in 29 tests (43%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 15.07 13.35
Recency 3 January 2017 5 May 2015
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile has a 12.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M395X in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
AMD Radeon R9 M395X
Radeon R9 M395X
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
R9 M395X Radeon R9 M395X
vs
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
vs
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
vs
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
vs
RTX 4090 Ti GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
GTX 745 OEM GeForce GTX 745 OEM
vs
R5 310 OEM Radeon R5 310 OEM
7600 GS GeForce 7600 GS
vs
GTS 250 GeForce GTS 250
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
GTX 1050 3 GB GTX 1050 3 GB
vs
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
RX Vega 5 Radeon RX Vega 5
vs
GT 750M SLI GeForce GT 750M SLI
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVS 5200M NVS 5200M
vs
HD 8670M Radeon HD 8670M
R5 240 OEM Radeon R5 240 OEM
vs
GeForce 840M GeForce 840M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 869 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 16 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M395X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile or Radeon R9 M395X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.