Arc A550M vs GeForce GTX 1070

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 with Arc A550M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
35.06
+42.4%

GTX 1070 outperforms Arc A550M by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking148231
Place by popularity26not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.63no data
Power efficiency16.0328.14
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGP104DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 June 2016 (8 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$379 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19202048
Core clock speed1506 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt60 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate202.0262.4
Floating-point processing power6.463 TFLOPS8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs120128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8 GB/s1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth256 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVIPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1070 35.06
+42.4%
Arc A550M 24.62

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1070 18255
+27.2%
Arc A550M 14350

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD117
+46.3%
80−85
−46.3%
1440p69
+53.3%
45−50
−53.3%
4K49
+63.3%
30−35
−63.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.24no data
1440p5.49no data
4K7.73no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+52.4%
60−65
−52.4%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+48%
50−55
−48%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+52.4%
60−65
−52.4%
Battlefield 5 141
+53.3%
90−95
−53.3%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+48%
50−55
−48%
Far Cry 5 106
+37.7%
75−80
−37.7%
Fortnite 256
+121%
110−120
−121%
Forza Horizon 4 129
+40.2%
90−95
−40.2%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+43.9%
65−70
−43.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 135
+50%
90−95
−50%
Valorant 200−210
+24.8%
160−170
−24.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+52.4%
60−65
−52.4%
Battlefield 5 119
+29.3%
90−95
−29.3%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+9.1%
250−260
−9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+48%
50−55
−48%
Dota 2 130−140
+15%
120−130
−15%
Far Cry 5 100
+29.9%
75−80
−29.9%
Fortnite 175
+50.9%
110−120
−50.9%
Forza Horizon 4 121
+31.5%
90−95
−31.5%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+43.9%
65−70
−43.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 111
+30.6%
85−90
−30.6%
Metro Exodus 62
+21.6%
50−55
−21.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 122
+35.6%
90−95
−35.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120
+73.9%
65−70
−73.9%
Valorant 200−210
+24.8%
160−170
−24.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 107
+16.3%
90−95
−16.3%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+48%
50−55
−48%
Dota 2 130−140
+15%
120−130
−15%
Far Cry 5 90
+16.9%
75−80
−16.9%
Forza Horizon 4 94
+2.2%
90−95
−2.2%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+43.9%
65−70
−43.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 81
−11.1%
90−95
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
−9.5%
65−70
+9.5%
Valorant 200−210
+24.8%
160−170
−24.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 127
+9.5%
110−120
−9.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+37.2%
160−170
−37.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+52.4%
40−45
−52.4%
Metro Exodus 38
+22.6%
30−35
−22.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+18.5%
200−210
−18.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 84
+29.2%
65−70
−29.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+56.5%
21−24
−56.5%
Far Cry 5 68
+28.3%
50−55
−28.3%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+33.9%
55−60
−33.9%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+41.5%
40−45
−41.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+55.3%
35−40
−55.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 79
+43.6%
55−60
−43.6%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+44.2%
40−45
−44.2%
Metro Exodus 23
+21.1%
18−20
−21.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+26.5%
30−35
−26.5%
Valorant 190−200
+47.8%
130−140
−47.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Dota 2 95−100
+30.3%
75−80
−30.3%
Far Cry 5 35
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+26.8%
40−45
−26.8%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+54.5%
21−24
−54.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 39
+56%
24−27
−56%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how GTX 1070 and Arc A550M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 is 46% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 is 53% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1070 is 63% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1070 is 121% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A550M is 11% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 is ahead in 63 tests (94%)
  • Arc A550M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.06 24.62
Chip lithography 16 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 60 Watt

GTX 1070 has a 42.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc A550M, on the other hand, has a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A550M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 is a desktop card while Arc A550M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070
Intel Arc A550M
Arc A550M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 8931 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 81 vote

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 or Arc A550M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.