Radeon RX 6950 XT vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and Radeon RX 6950 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1070 Ti
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 180 Watt
38.12

RX 6950 XT outperforms GTX 1070 Ti by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12117
Place by popularity59not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.6526.57
Power efficiency14.5714.97
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP104Navi 21
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 November 2017 (7 years ago)10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $1,099

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1070 Ti has 15% better value for money than RX 6950 XT.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24325120
Core clock speed1607 MHz1925 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz2324 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt335 Watt
Texture fill rate255.8743.7
Floating-point processing power8.186 TFLOPS23.8 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs152320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2002 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.3 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1070 Ti 38.12
RX 6950 XT 72.94
+91.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1070 Ti 14694
RX 6950 XT 28115
+91.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1070 Ti 27503
RX 6950 XT 72228
+163%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1070 Ti 18405
RX 6950 XT 59882
+225%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1070 Ti 88161
RX 6950 XT 229172
+160%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1070 Ti 442105
RX 6950 XT 497297
+12.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD112
−96.4%
220
+96.4%
1440p70
−91.4%
134
+91.4%
4K50
−66%
83
+66%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.565.00
1440p5.708.20
4K7.9813.24

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−144%
161
+144%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
−86.4%
150−160
+86.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
−100%
130−140
+100%
Battlefield 5 120−130
−91.1%
230−240
+91.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
−55.8%
120−130
+55.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−117%
143
+117%
Far Cry 5 100
−17%
110−120
+17%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
−90.5%
180−190
+90.5%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−28%
240−250
+28%
Hitman 3 80−85
−59.3%
120−130
+59.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
−65%
260−270
+65%
Metro Exodus 138
−12.3%
150−160
+12.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−36.7%
120−130
+36.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
−127%
300−350
+127%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−20.5%
150−160
+20.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
−86.4%
150−160
+86.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
−100%
130−140
+100%
Battlefield 5 60
−292%
230−240
+292%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
−55.8%
120−130
+55.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−93.9%
128
+93.9%
Far Cry 5 82
−42.7%
110−120
+42.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 44
−311%
180−190
+311%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−28%
240−250
+28%
Hitman 3 80−85
−59.3%
120−130
+59.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
−65%
260−270
+65%
Metro Exodus 122
−27%
150−160
+27%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−36.7%
120−130
+36.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
−220%
442
+220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
−101%
150−160
+101%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−20.5%
150−160
+20.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63
−140%
150−160
+140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
−100%
130−140
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
−55.8%
120−130
+55.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−84.8%
122
+84.8%
Far Cry 5 59
−98.3%
110−120
+98.3%
Forza Horizon 4 100
−142%
240−250
+142%
Hitman 3 80−85
−59.3%
120−130
+59.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
−98.8%
318
+98.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
−187%
396
+187%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
−200%
216
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+18.7%
107
−18.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−36.7%
120−130
+36.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80
−108%
160−170
+108%
Far Cry New Dawn 64
−75%
110−120
+75%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
−81.3%
85−90
+81.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−124%
90−95
+124%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−82.2%
80−85
+82.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−210%
93
+210%
Far Cry 5 42
−100%
80−85
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−26%
270−280
+26%
Hitman 3 45−50
−118%
100−110
+118%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−211%
255
+211%
Metro Exodus 76
−73.7%
132
+73.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
−220%
294
+220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−145%
130−140
+145%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
−27%
240−250
+27%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−81.5%
110−120
+81.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40
−120%
85−90
+120%
Far Cry New Dawn 35
−97.1%
65−70
+97.1%
Hitman 3 30−35
−110%
65−70
+110%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
−27%
220−230
+27%
Metro Exodus 42
−183%
110−120
+183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
−206%
144
+206%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27
−126%
60−65
+126%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−146%
55−60
+146%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−117%
50−55
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−254%
46
+254%
Far Cry 5 23
−117%
50−55
+117%
Forza Horizon 4 55
−140%
130−140
+140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−231%
172
+231%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−242%
65
+242%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−141%
80−85
+141%

This is how GTX 1070 Ti and RX 6950 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6950 XT is 96% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6950 XT is 91% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6950 XT is 66% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1070 Ti is 19% faster.
  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6950 XT is 311% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 Ti is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RX 6950 XT is ahead in 71 test (99%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.12 72.94
Recency 2 November 2017 10 May 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 335 Watt

GTX 1070 Ti has 86.1% lower power consumption.

RX 6950 XT, on the other hand, has a 91.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
Radeon RX 6950 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 3738 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2722 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6950 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.