Radeon 630 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile and Radeon 630, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1050 Mobile
2017
4000 MB GDDR5, 75 Watt
10.75
+195%

GTX 1050 Mobile outperforms 630 by a whopping 195% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking433719
Place by popularity83not in top-100
Power efficiency10.495.34
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP107BPolaris 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2017 (8 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640512
Core clock speed1354 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speed1493 MHz1218 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate59.7238.98
Floating-point processing power1.911 TFLOPS1.247 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4000 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI-+
HDCP2.2-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GPU Boost3.0no data
Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p73
+204%
24−27
−204%
Full HD46
+229%
14−16
−229%
1440p24
+200%
8−9
−200%
4K15
+200%
5−6
−200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 51
+264%
14−16
−264%
Far Cry 5 39
+290%
10−11
−290%
Fortnite 132
+529%
21−24
−529%
Forza Horizon 4 55
+224%
16−18
−224%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 46
+188%
16−18
−188%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 44
+214%
14−16
−214%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+141%
65−70
−141%
Dota 2 126
+271%
30−35
−271%
Far Cry 5 36
+260%
10−11
−260%
Fortnite 51
+143%
21−24
−143%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+206%
16−18
−206%
Grand Theft Auto V 42
+282%
10−12
−282%
Metro Exodus 19
+171%
7−8
−171%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
+156%
16−18
−156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+255%
10−12
−255%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 37
+164%
14−16
−164%
Dota 2 115
+238%
30−35
−238%
Far Cry 5 33
+230%
10−11
−230%
Forza Horizon 4 37
+118%
16−18
−118%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 29
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+100%
10−12
−100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 39
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+193%
27−30
−193%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Metro Exodus 11
+450%
2−3
−450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 26
+225%
8−9
−225%
Far Cry 5 21
+133%
9−10
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+189%
9−10
−189%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 25
+257%
7−8
−257%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 7
+250%
2−3
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 13
+225%
4−5
−225%
Dota 2 34
+183%
12−14
−183%
Far Cry 5 11
+120%
5−6
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+275%
4−5
−275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12
+200%
4−5
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10
+150%
4−5
−150%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High Preset

Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Mobile and Radeon 630 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 204% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 229% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 200% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1050 Mobile is 529% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Mobile is ahead in 34 tests (59%)
  • there's a draw in 24 tests (41%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.75 3.65
Recency 3 January 2017 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4000 MB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 1050 Mobile has a 194.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 95.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Radeon 630, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 50% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 630 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050
AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1349 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 33 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile or Radeon 630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.