Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Radeon R9 270X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1050 Ti
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.44
+29.7%

GTX 1050 Ti outperforms R9 270X by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking332396
Place by popularity7not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.105.86
Power efficiency15.124.86
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGP107Curacao
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)8 October 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1050 Ti has 141% better value for money than R9 270X.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681280
Core clock speed1291 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1392 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt180 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.8284.00
Floating-point processing power2.138 TFLOPS2.688 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2 x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s179.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
HDMI++
DisplayPort support-+
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+
CrossFire-+
FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
LiquidVR-+
TressFX-+
TrueAudio-+
UVD-+
DDMA audiono data+
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti 16.44
+29.7%
R9 270X 12.68

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Ti 6321
+29.6%
R9 270X 4876

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Ti 7485
+14.1%
R9 270X 6560

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD49
+40%
35−40
−40%
1440p30
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
4K26
+44.4%
18−21
−44.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.84
+100%
5.69
−100%
1440p4.63
+105%
9.48
−105%
4K5.35
+107%
11.06
−107%
  • GTX 1050 Ti has 100% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti has 105% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti has 107% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+26.1%
21−24
−26.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+28%
24−27
−28%
Elden Ring 50−55
+34.2%
35−40
−34.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+29.3%
40−45
−29.3%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+26.1%
21−24
−26.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−127%
24−27
+127%
Forza Horizon 4 67
+31.4%
50−55
−31.4%
Metro Exodus 48
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+21.9%
30−35
−21.9%
Valorant 63
+26%
50−55
−26%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 47
+14.6%
40−45
−14.6%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+26.1%
21−24
−26.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−178%
24−27
+178%
Dota 2 90
+95.7%
45−50
−95.7%
Elden Ring 50−55
+34.2%
35−40
−34.2%
Far Cry 5 77
+57.1%
45−50
−57.1%
Fortnite 90−95
+25%
70−75
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 50
−2%
50−55
+2%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
+42.2%
45−50
−42.2%
Metro Exodus 32
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 26
−262%
90−95
+262%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18
−77.8%
30−35
+77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−90%
35−40
+90%
Valorant 34
−47.1%
50−55
+47.1%
World of Tanks 200−210
+19.8%
170−180
−19.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 39
−5.1%
40−45
+5.1%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+26.1%
21−24
−26.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+28%
24−27
−28%
Dota 2 125
+172%
45−50
−172%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+20.4%
45−50
−20.4%
Forza Horizon 4 43
−18.6%
50−55
+18.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+23.4%
90−95
−23.4%
Valorant 53
+6%
50−55
−6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 29
+70.6%
16−18
−70.6%
Elden Ring 24−27
+36.8%
18−20
−36.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+80%
85−90
−80%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
World of Tanks 110−120
+26.7%
90−95
−26.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+32%
24−27
−32%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+41.4%
27−30
−41.4%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30−33
+0%
Metro Exodus 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Valorant 39
+25.8%
30−35
−25.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Dota 2 28
+21.7%
21−24
−21.7%
Elden Ring 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 28
+21.7%
21−24
−21.7%
Metro Exodus 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 31
−19.4%
35−40
+19.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+21.7%
21−24
−21.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 63
+174%
21−24
−174%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Fortnite 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Forza Horizon 4 17
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti and R9 270X compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti is 40% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti is 43% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti is 44% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti is 174% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 270X is 262% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti is ahead in 50 tests (79%)
  • R9 270X is ahead in 11 tests (17%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.44 12.68
Recency 25 October 2016 8 October 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 180 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti has a 29.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 270X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
AMD Radeon R9 270X
Radeon R9 270X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 207401 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 751 vote

Rate Radeon R9 270X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.