GeForce GTX 1650 vs GTX 1050 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1050 Ti
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.44

GTX 1650 outperforms GTX 1050 Ti by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking332271
Place by popularity73
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.1038.38
Power efficiency15.1218.84
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP107TU117
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 $149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 has 172% better value for money than GTX 1050 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768896
Core clock speed1291 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1392 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.8293.24
Floating-point processing power2.138 TFLOPS2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti 16.44
GTX 1650 20.48
+24.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Ti 6321
GTX 1650 7874
+24.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Ti 9453
GTX 1650 13645
+44.3%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Ti 7485
GTX 1650 9203
+23%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Ti 50939
+0.8%
GTX 1650 50549

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1050 Ti 20745
GTX 1650 39154
+88.7%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Ti 352876
GTX 1650 373333
+5.8%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 1050 Ti 19795
GTX 1650 35853
+81.1%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 1050 Ti 20616
GTX 1650 39941
+93.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD49
−40.8%
69
+40.8%
1440p30
−33.3%
40
+33.3%
4K26
+13%
23
−13%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.84
−31.4%
2.16
+31.4%
1440p4.63
−24.4%
3.73
+24.4%
4K5.35
+21.2%
6.48
−21.2%
  • GTX 1650 has 31% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 has 24% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti has 21% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−27.6%
35−40
+27.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−28.1%
40−45
+28.1%
Elden Ring 50−55
−27.5%
65−70
+27.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−24.5%
66
+24.5%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−27.6%
35−40
+27.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−54.5%
17
+54.5%
Forza Horizon 4 67
−40.3%
94
+40.3%
Metro Exodus 48
−37.5%
66
+37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−97.4%
77
+97.4%
Valorant 63
−34.9%
85
+34.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 47
−59.6%
75
+59.6%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−27.6%
35−40
+27.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−55.6%
14
+55.6%
Dota 2 90
+9.8%
82
−9.8%
Elden Ring 50−55
−27.5%
65−70
+27.5%
Far Cry 5 77
−16.9%
90
+16.9%
Fortnite 90−95
+9.8%
82
−9.8%
Forza Horizon 4 50
−48%
74
+48%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
−17.2%
75
+17.2%
Metro Exodus 32
−37.5%
44
+37.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 26
−427%
130−140
+427%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18
−55.6%
28
+55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−220%
60−65
+220%
Valorant 34
−35.3%
46
+35.3%
World of Tanks 200−210
−14.1%
230−240
+14.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 39
−41%
55
+41%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−27.6%
35−40
+27.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+167%
12
−167%
Dota 2 125
+35.9%
92
−35.9%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−15.3%
65−70
+15.3%
Forza Horizon 4 43
−44.2%
62
+44.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+90.2%
61
−90.2%
Valorant 53
−32.1%
70
+32.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 29
−10.3%
30−35
+10.3%
Elden Ring 24−27
−30.8%
30−35
+30.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
−13.8%
30−35
+13.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−12.4%
170−180
+12.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−13.3%
17
+13.3%
World of Tanks 110−120
−21.9%
130−140
+21.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−15.2%
38
+15.2%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−21.4%
16−18
+21.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+71.4%
7
−71.4%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−36.6%
55−60
+36.6%
Forza Horizon 4 30
−50%
45
+50%
Metro Exodus 29
−41.4%
41
+41.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−33.3%
27−30
+33.3%
Valorant 39
−2.6%
40
+2.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Dota 2 28
−3.6%
29
+3.6%
Elden Ring 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 28
−3.6%
29
+3.6%
Metro Exodus 9
−33.3%
12
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 31
−100%
60−65
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−3.6%
29
+3.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−12.5%
18
+12.5%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3
−66.7%
Dota 2 63
+6.8%
59
−6.8%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−23.8%
24−27
+23.8%
Fortnite 18−20
−31.6%
24−27
+31.6%
Forza Horizon 4 17
−52.9%
26
+52.9%
Valorant 18−20
−16.7%
21
+16.7%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti and GTX 1650 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 is 41% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 is 33% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti is 13% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti is 167% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 is 427% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti is ahead in 8 tests (13%)
  • GTX 1650 is ahead in 55 tests (87%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.44 20.48
Recency 25 October 2016 23 April 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm

GTX 1650 has a 24.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 207401 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 24285 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.