Radeon RX 6750 XT vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile with Radeon RX 6750 XT, including specs and performance data.

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
2018
3 MB GDDR5
12.81

RX 6750 XT outperforms Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile by a whopping 320% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking36540
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data30.08
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateApril 2018 (6 years ago)3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549
Current priceno data$559 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682560
Core clock speed1366 MHz2150 MHz
Boost clock speed1442 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data416.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile and Radeon RX 6750 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 MB12 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth84 GB/s432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Multi-Projection+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan+1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 12.81
RX 6750 XT 53.77
+320%

Radeon RX 6750 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile by 320% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 6401
RX 6750 XT 37609
+488%

Radeon RX 6750 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile by 488% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−351%
158
+351%
1440p18−21
−389%
88
+389%
4K12−14
−333%
52
+333%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 165
−294%
650−700
+294%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
−293%
350−400
+293%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
−276%
350−400
+276%
Battlefield 5 170−180
−309%
700−750
+309%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−285%
400−450
+285%
Cyberpunk 2077 127
−294%
500−550
+294%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−281%
400−450
+281%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
−285%
500−550
+285%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−312%
750−800
+312%
Hitman 3 100−110
−274%
400−450
+274%
Horizon Zero Dawn 376
−312%
1550−1600
+312%
Metro Exodus 130−140
−317%
550−600
+317%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−295%
450−500
+295%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 368
−308%
1500−1550
+308%
Watch Dogs: Legion 135
−307%
550−600
+307%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
−293%
350−400
+293%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
−276%
350−400
+276%
Battlefield 5 170−180
−309%
700−750
+309%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−285%
400−450
+285%
Cyberpunk 2077 109
−313%
450−500
+313%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−281%
400−450
+281%
Far Cry New Dawn 130−140
−285%
500−550
+285%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−312%
750−800
+312%
Hitman 3 100−110
−274%
400−450
+274%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
−302%
900−950
+302%
Metro Exodus 72
−317%
300−310
+317%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−295%
450−500
+295%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 304
−311%
1250−1300
+311%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 245
−308%
1000−1050
+308%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−285%
450−500
+285%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
−293%
350−400
+293%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
−276%
350−400
+276%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−285%
400−450
+285%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
−308%
400−450
+308%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−281%
400−450
+281%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−312%
750−800
+312%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210
−305%
850−900
+305%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 260
−304%
1050−1100
+304%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 135
−307%
550−600
+307%
Watch Dogs: Legion 98
−308%
400−450
+308%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−295%
450−500
+295%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
−302%
450−500
+302%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
−300%
500−550
+300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
−317%
250−260
+317%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−313%
260−270
+313%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−312%
350−400
+312%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
−317%
250−260
+317%
Far Cry 5 141
−290%
550−600
+290%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−317%
500−550
+317%
Hitman 3 75−80
−300%
300−310
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 158
−311%
650−700
+311%
Metro Exodus 126
−297%
500−550
+297%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 186
−303%
750−800
+303%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
−298%
350−400
+298%
Watch Dogs: Legion 73
−311%
300−310
+311%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−280%
350−400
+280%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−307%
240−250
+307%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−308%
200−210
+308%
Hitman 3 45−50
−300%
180−190
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−300%
300−310
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60
−317%
250−260
+317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
−280%
300−310
+280%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−300%
160−170
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−305%
150−160
+305%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
−285%
100−105
+285%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−300%
140−150
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−275%
300−310
+275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90
−289%
350−400
+289%
Metro Exodus 82
−266%
300−310
+266%
Watch Dogs: Legion 41
−315%
170−180
+315%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−304%
210−220
+304%

This is how Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 351% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 389% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT is 333% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.81 53.77
Maximum RAM amount 3 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 96 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2208 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.