Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Quadro RTX 6000 vs GeForce GTS 450
Aggregated performance score
GTS 450
2010
1024 MB GDDR5
3.41
RTX 6000
2018
24 GB GDDR6
48.72
+1329%
Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms GeForce GTS 450 by 1329% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 692 | 57 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 0.31 | 10.04 |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Turing (2018−2021) |
| GPU code name | GF106 | TU102 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 September 2010 (13 years old) | 13 August 2018 (5 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | $6,299 |
| Current price | $127 (1x MSRP) | $3083 (0.5x MSRP) |
Value for money
RTX 6000 has 3139% better value for money than GTS 450.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 4608 |
| CUDA cores | 192 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 783 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1770 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 18,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 106 Watt | 260 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 25.1 billion/sec | 509.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 601.3 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | 267 mm |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| SLI options | + | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.7 GB/s | 672.0 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI | 4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| HDMI | + | no data |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | 7.5 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms GeForce GTS 450 by 1329% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms GeForce GTS 450 by 1328% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms GeForce GTS 450 by 2712% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 28
−1329%
| 400−450
+1329%
|
| Full HD | 38
−1216%
| 500−550
+1216%
|
| 1200p | 27
−1196%
| 350−400
+1196%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
−1285%
|
180−190
+1285%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
−1233%
|
120−130
+1233%
|
| Hitman 3 | 7−8
−1329%
|
100−105
+1329%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
−1329%
|
100−105
+1329%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
−1300%
|
140−150
+1300%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
−1285%
|
180−190
+1285%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
−1233%
|
120−130
+1233%
|
| Hitman 3 | 7−8
−1329%
|
100−105
+1329%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
−1329%
|
100−105
+1329%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
−1300%
|
140−150
+1300%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
−1233%
|
120−130
+1233%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
| Hitman 3 | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
−1300%
|
140−150
+1300%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−1329%
|
100−105
+1329%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| Hitman 3 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
−1329%
|
100−105
+1329%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−1275%
|
55−60
+1275%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
This is how GTS 450 and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:
900p resolution:
- RTX 6000 is 1329% faster than GTS 450
1080p resolution:
- RTX 6000 is 1216% faster than GTS 450
1200p resolution:
- RTX 6000 is 1196% faster than GTS 450
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 3.41 | 48.72 |
| Recency | 13 September 2010 | 13 August 2018 |
| Cost | $129 | $6299 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 24 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 106 Watt | 260 Watt |
The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 450 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTS 450 is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
