ATI Radeon X1050 vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and Radeon X1050, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GTS 450 Rev. 2 outperforms ATI X1050 by a whopping 3308% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 666 | 1437 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 2.87 | 0.37 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | Rage 9 (2003−2006) |
| GPU code name | GF116 | RV370 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 March 2011 (13 years ago) | 7 December 2006 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 783 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 107 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 110 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 106 Watt | 24 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 25.06 | 1.600 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.6013 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | 4 |
| TMUs | 32 | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 210 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 902 MHz | 333 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.73 GB/s | 5.328 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
| HDMI | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 9.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.43 | 0.13 |
| Recency | 15 March 2011 | 7 December 2006 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 110 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 106 Watt | 24 Watt |
GTS 450 Rev. 2 has a 3307.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 175% more advanced lithography process.
ATI X1050, on the other hand, has 341.7% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1050 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
