UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs GeForce GTS 350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 335M GTS 250M GTS 260M GTS 350M GTS 360M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTS 350M and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTS 350M
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 28 Watt
1.06

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms GTS 350M by a whopping 323% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTS 350M GTS 350M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1095660
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.7811.74
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGT215Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9648
CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed500 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors727 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate16.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops360no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-IIno data
SLI options+-
MXM TypeMXM 3.0 Type-Bno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speedUp to 2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPortLVDSHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGAno data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12_1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−325%
17
+325%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−267%
11
+267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 27−30
Hitman 3 5−6
−100%
10
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−177%
36
+177%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 27−30
Hitman 3 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−143%
17
+143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−54.5%
16−18
+54.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 27−30
Hitman 3 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+8.3%
12
−8.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−129%
16
+129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+37.5%
8
−37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 4−5
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−600%
27−30
+600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 3−4

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 2−3
Far Cry 5 0−1 2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12
+0%
12
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how GTS 350M and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 325% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTS 350M is 38% faster.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTS 350M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is ahead in 41 test (69%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (27%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.06 4.48
Recency 7 January 2010 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has a 322.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 350M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
GeForce GTS 350M
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTS 350M GeForce GTS 350M
vs
HD 7470M Radeon HD 7470M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 Iris Plus Graphics 655
GTS 350M GeForce GTS 350M
vs
R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
GTS 350M GeForce GTS 350M
vs
GTX 1650 GDDR6 GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
GTS 350M GeForce GTS 350M
vs
Graphics Radeon Graphics
GTS 350M GeForce GTS 350M
vs
GeForce MX330 GeForce MX330
GTS 350M GeForce GTS 350M
vs
Kalindi Kalindi
GTS 350M GeForce GTS 350M
vs
Iris Xe Graphics MAX Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GTS 350M GeForce GTS 350M
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
GTS 350M GeForce GTS 350M
vs
RTX 3050 4 GB GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
GTS 350M GeForce GTS 350M
vs
RTX 4050 Mobile GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 7 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 445 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.