ATI Radeon HD 5670 vs GeForce GT 710

Place in the ranking	951	872
Place by popularity	83	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.04	0.20
Power efficiency	5.93	2.25
Architecture	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	GK208	Redwood
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	27 March 2014 (10 years ago)	14 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$34.99	$119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

ATI HD 5670 has 400% better value for money than GT 710.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	400
Core clock speed	954 MHz	775 MHz
Number of transistors	915 million	627 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	19 Watt	64 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	95 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	15.26	15.50
Floating-point processing power	0.3663 TFLOPS	0.62 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	16	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	145 mm	168 mm
Height	2.713" (6.9 cm)	no data
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1.8 GB/s	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Multi monitor support	3 displays	no data
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision	+	-
PureVideo	+	-
PhysX	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 710 1.63

ATI HD 5670 2.08
+27.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 710 627

ATI HD 5670 802
+27.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	18−21 −44.4%	26 +44.4%
Full HD	8 −300%	32 +300%
1440p	4 −25%	5−6 +25%
4K	7 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	4.37	3.72
1440p	8.75	23.80
4K	5.00	14.88

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−25%

5−6
+25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Hitman 3	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −5.9%	35−40 +5.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Hitman 3	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5 −100%	10−11 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −5.9%	35−40 +5.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Hitman 3	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5 −100%	10−11 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3 −300%	12−14 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −5.9%	35−40 +5.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−33.3%

4−5
+33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Hitman 3	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5 −20%	6−7 +20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−25%

5−6
+25%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5 −20%	6−7 +20%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

+0%

3−4

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5

0−1

This is how GT 710 and ATI HD 5670 compete in popular games:

ATI HD 5670 is 44% faster in 900p
ATI HD 5670 is 300% faster in 1080p
ATI HD 5670 is 25% faster in 1440p
ATI HD 5670 is 14% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI HD 5670 is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

ATI HD 5670 is ahead in 37 tests (70%)
there's a draw in 16 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.63	2.08
Recency	27 March 2014	14 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	19 Watt	64 Watt

GT 710 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 236.8% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 5670, on the other hand, has a 27.6% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon HD 5670 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.