Radeon HD 5450 vs GeForce GT 640M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking803not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.22no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameN13P-GSCedar
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years old)4 February 2010 (14 years old)
Current price$310 $205
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38480
CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speedUp to 625 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed645 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,270 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt19 Watt
Texture fill rateUp to 20.0 billion/sec5.200
Floating-point performance480.0 gflops104 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 640M and Radeon HD 5450 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3\GDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 - 4000 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 64.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI++
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
Optimus+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 640M 919
+576%
ATI HD 5450 136

GeForce GT 640M outperforms Radeon HD 5450 by 576% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GT 640M 1225
+433%
ATI HD 5450 230

GeForce GT 640M outperforms Radeon HD 5450 by 433% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 22 March 2012 4 February 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 19 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 640M and Radeon HD 5450. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640M is a notebook card while Radeon HD 5450 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
GeForce GT 640M
ATI Radeon HD 5450
Radeon HD 5450

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 271 vote

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 1026 votes

Rate ATI Radeon HD 5450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.