GeForce FX Go5700 vs GT 640M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking806not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.24no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameN13P-GSNV36
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)1 February 2005 (19 years ago)
Current price$310 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speedUp to 625 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed645 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,270 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Wattno data
Texture fill rateUp to 20.0 billion/sec1.800
Floating-point performance480.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 640M and GeForce FX Go5700 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3\GDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 - 4000 MHz550 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 64.0 GB/s8.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API9.0a
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.51.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 640M 918
+1700%
FX Go5700 51

GT 640M outperforms FX Go5700 by 1700% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2012 1 February 2005
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 640M and GeForce FX Go5700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640M is a notebook card while GeForce FX Go5700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
GeForce GT 640M
NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5700
GeForce FX Go5700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 282 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce FX Go5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.