NVS 510 vs GeForce GT 630 OEM

Place in the ranking	937	915
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.07
Power efficiency	2.30	3.54
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GK107	GK107
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	24 April 2012 (12 years ago)	23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	192
Core clock speed	875 MHz	797 MHz
Number of transistors	1,270 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	14.00	12.75
Floating-point processing power	0.336 TFLOPS	0.306 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	16	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	145 mm	160 mm
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	891 MHz	891 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	28.51 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	4x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.66	1.79
Recency	24 April 2012	23 October 2012
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	35 Watt

NVS 510 has a 7.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GT 630 OEM and NVS 510.

Be aware that GeForce GT 630 OEM is a desktop card while NVS 510 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.