NVS 510: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregated performance score

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 1.81% of a leader's which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

RTX 4090GeForce RTX4090
Compare

Summary

NVIDIA started NVS 510 sales 23 October 2012 at a recommended price of $449 . This is a Kepler architecture desktop card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 2 GB of DDR3 memory clocked at 1.78 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 28.51 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is single-slot card attached via PCIe 2.0 x16 interface. Its manufacturer default version has a length of 160 mm. No additional power connector is required, and power consumption is at 35 Watt.

General info

Some basic facts about NVS 510: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in performance ranking876
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Value for money0.14
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK107
Market segmentWorkstation
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$449
Current price$61 (0.1x MSRP)of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Technical specs

NVS 510's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of NVS 510's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)
Core clock speed797 MHzof 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Number of transistors1,270 millionof 14400 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology28 nmof 4 (Radeon 780M)
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattof 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate12.75of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB)
Floating-point performance306.0 gflopsof 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

Size and compatibility

This section provides details about the physical dimensions of NVS 510 and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16
Length160 mm
Width1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on NVS 510: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GBof 192 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Memory bus width128 Bitof 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed1782 MHzof 23000 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER)
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/sof 3276 (Aldebaran)

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on NVS 510. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort

API support

APIs supported by NVS 510, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.1
OpenGL4.6
OpenCL1.2
Vulkan1.1.126
CUDA3.0

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of NVS 510. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 510 1.81

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

NVS 510 702

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

NVS 510 1667

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

NVS 510 1718

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

NVS 510 1282

Gaming performance

Let's see how good NVS 510 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Relative performance

Overall NVS 510 performance compared to nearest competitors among server video cards.


Quadro K420 106.08
Quadro K600 106.08
GRID K140Q 103.87
NVS 510 100
GRID K1 92.82

AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to NVS 510 is FirePro V3900, which is slower by 8% and lower by 18 positions in our ranking.

FirePro V3900FireProV3900
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to NVS 510:

FirePro V5900 181.22
FirePro V4900 140.88
FirePro W2100 128.73
NVS 510 100

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

GRID K140QGRIDK140Q
Compare
Quadro K420QuadroK420
Compare
Quadro K600QuadroK600
Compare
GRID K1GRIDK1
Compare
FirePro V3900FireProV3900
Compare
GRID K160QGRIDK160Q
Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with NVS 510 according to our statistics.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


2.9 48 votes

Rate NVS 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about NVS 510, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.