Radeon RX 6700 XT vs GeForce GT 550M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 550M with Radeon RX 6700 XT, including specs and performance data.

GT 550M
2011
1536 MB DDR3, GDDR5, 35 Watt
1.48

RX 6700 XT outperforms GT 550M by a whopping 3380% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking93846
Place by popularitynot in top-10099
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2723.28
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN12P-GTNavi 22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2011 (13 years ago)3 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$479
Current price$55 $685 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6700 XT has 8522% better value for money than GT 550M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962560
Core clock speed740 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2581 MHz
Number of transistors585 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate11.84413.0
Floating-point performance284.16 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 550M and Radeon RX 6700 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 550M 1.48
RX 6700 XT 51.50
+3380%

Radeon RX 6700 XT outperforms GeForce GT 550M by 3380% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 26%

GT 550M 573
RX 6700 XT 19883
+3370%

Radeon RX 6700 XT outperforms GeForce GT 550M by 3370% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GT 550M 974
RX 6700 XT 45676
+4592%

Radeon RX 6700 XT outperforms GeForce GT 550M by 4592% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GT 550M 4782
RX 6700 XT 109039
+2180%

Radeon RX 6700 XT outperforms GeForce GT 550M by 2180% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p15
−3233%
500−550
+3233%
Full HD21
−619%
151
+619%
1440p2−3
−4200%
86
+4200%
4K1−2
−4900%
50
+4900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2875%
119
+2875%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2375%
99
+2375%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−5050%
100−110
+5050%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−3025%
120−130
+3025%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5800%
170−180
+5800%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3350%
138
+3350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−3164%
359
+3164%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5450%
110−120
+5450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−4786%
342
+4786%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−850%
110−120
+850%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90
+2150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−5050%
100−110
+5050%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−3025%
120−130
+3025%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5800%
170−180
+5800%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2675%
111
+2675%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−1782%
200−210
+1782%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5450%
110−120
+5450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−3914%
281
+3914%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−4360%
223
+4360%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−850%
110−120
+850%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2025%
85
+2025%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−5050%
100−110
+5050%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5800%
170−180
+5800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−1655%
193
+1655%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−3329%
240
+3329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2440%
127
+2440%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−600%
84
+600%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5450%
110−120
+5450%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−5200%
100−110
+5200%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−5700%
55−60
+5700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1950%
80−85
+1950%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5500%
56
+5500%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1086%
83
+1086%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−2800%
145
+2800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−8200%
80−85
+8200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2125%
85−90
+2125%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−4600%
45−50
+4600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−1775%
75−80
+1775%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3700%
35−40
+3700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−4700%
48
+4700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 35−40
Far Cry 5 0−1 30−35
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−1975%
83
+1975%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1533%
45−50
+1533%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 169
+0%
169
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 144
+0%
144
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 73
+0%
73
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 125
+0%
125
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 137
+0%
137
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 123
+0%
123
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 173
+0%
173
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 62
+0%
62
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hitman 3 48
+0%
48
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 57
+0%
57
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+0%
74
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 76
+0%
76
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35
+0%
35
+0%

This is how GT 550M and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700 XT is 3233% faster in 900p
  • RX 6700 XT is 619% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT is 4200% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT is 4900% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6700 XT is 8200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6700 XT is ahead in 49 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 21 test (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.48 51.50
Recency 6 January 2011 3 March 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 230 Watt

GT 550M has 557.1% lower power consumption.

RX 6700 XT, on the other hand, has a 3379.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 550M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 550M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
GeForce GT 550M
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 58 votes

Rate GeForce GT 550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 6024 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.