Radeon Vega 7 vs GeForce GT 430

Place in the ranking	973	536
Place by popularity	not in top-100	12
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.05	no data
Power efficiency	2.19	11.43
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GF108	Cezanne
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	11 October 2010 (14 years ago)	13 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$79	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	448
CUDA cores per GPU	96	no data
Core clock speed	700 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1900 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	49 Watt	45 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	98 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	11.20	53.20
Floating-point processing power	0.2688 TFLOPS	1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	8
TMUs	16	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI-E 2.0 x 16	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	IGP
Length	145 mm	no data
Height	2.713" (6.9 cm)	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	25.6 - 28.8 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	HDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI	No outputs
HDMI	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 430 1.50

Vega 7 7.19
+379%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 430 720

Vega 7 3348
+365%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	4−5 −475%	23 +475%
1440p	5−6 −400%	25 +400%
4K	3−4 −400%	15 +400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	19.75	no data
1440p	15.80	no data
4K	26.33	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −190%	29 +190%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −2000%	21 +2000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −286%	27 +286%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Dota 2	2−3 −750%	17 +750%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −155%	28 +155%
Fortnite	7−8 −529%	40−45 +529%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −140%	24 +140%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −1400%	15 +1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −188%	46 +188%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −188%	21−24 +188%
World of Tanks	30−35 −81.3%	58 +81.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Dota 2	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −200%	30−35 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −110%	21 +110%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −275%	60−65 +275%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	6−7
World of Tanks	9−10 −500%	50−55 +500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −220%	16−18 +220%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Valorant	7−8 −171%	18−20 +171%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Dota 2	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −367%	70−75 +367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −450%	21−24 +450%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −20%	18−20 +20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Dota 2	16−18 −369%	75−80 +369%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Valorant	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Forza Horizon 5	18 +0%	18 +0%
Valorant	29 +0%	29 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Forza Horizon 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Valorant	14 +0%	14 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 5	12 +0%	12 +0%
Valorant	25 +0%	25 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2

9−10

+0%

9−10

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus

3−4

+0%

3−4

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Fortnite	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

This is how GT 430 and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

Vega 7 is 475% faster in 1080p
Vega 7 is 400% faster in 1440p
Vega 7 is 400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Vega 7 is 2000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Vega 7 is ahead in 36 tests (72%)
there's a draw in 14 tests (28%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.50	7.19
Recency	11 October 2010	13 April 2021
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	49 Watt	45 Watt

Vega 7 has a 379.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 8.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Vega 7 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 430 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 430 is a desktop card while Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.