Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile vs GeForce GT 430

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	928	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.05	no data
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GF108	Lucienne
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	11 October 2010 (13 years ago)	12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$79	no data
Current price	$59 (0.7x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	512
CUDA cores per GPU	96	no data
Core clock speed	700 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1900 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	49 Watt	25 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	98 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	11.2 billion/sec	60.80
Floating-point performance	268.8 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 430 and Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCI-E 2.0 x 16	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	IGP
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)	no data
Height	2.713" (6.9 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	25.6 - 28.8 GB/s	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	HDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7 (6.4)
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	+	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	11 October 2010	12 January 2021
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	49 Watt	25 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---