Radeon HD 6510G2 vs GeForce GT 230M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
220M 230M 240M 240M LE 540M 630M 635M 640M 650M 720M 740M 750M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6510G2 6515G2 6520G 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics 6530M 6540G2 6545G2 6550A 6550M 6570M 6570M Mac Edition

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 230M and Radeon HD 6510G2, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 230M
2009
Up to 1 GB GDDR3, 23 Watt
0.49

HD 6510G2 outperforms 230M by a whopping 133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GT 230M GT 230M
HD 6510G2 HD 6510G2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12721084
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.72no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGT216no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 June 2009 (16 years ago)14 June 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48400
Core clock speed500 MHzno data
Number of transistors486 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Wattno data
Texture fill rate8.000no data
Floating-point processing power0.1056 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops158no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amountUp to 1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speedUp to 600 (DDR2), Up to 800 (GDDR3), Up to 1066 (GDDR3) MHzno data
Memory bandwidth16 (DDR2), 25 (DDR3)no data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVIno data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIHDAno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 0−1 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Valorant 27−30
−17.9%
30−35
+17.9%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−64.7%
27−30
+64.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Far Cry 5 0−1 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Valorant 27−30
−17.9%
30−35
+17.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Far Cry 5 0−1 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Valorant 27−30
−17.9%
30−35
+17.9%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 2−3

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High

Valorant 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 6510G2 is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 6510G2 performs better in 29 tests (66%)
  • there's a draw in 15 tests (34%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.49 1.14
Recency 15 June 2009 14 June 2011

HD 6510G2 has a 132.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Radeon HD 6510G2 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 230M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
GeForce GT 230M
AMD Radeon HD 6510G2
Radeon HD 6510G2
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 230M GeForce GT 230M
vs
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
HD 6510G2 Radeon HD 6510G2
vs
GT 425M GeForce GT 425M
GT 230M GeForce GT 230M
vs
HD 8250 Radeon HD 8250
GT 520M NVIDIA GT 520M
vs
HD 6510G2 6510G2
HD 6510G2 AMD HD 6510G2
vs
GTX 285M 285M
HD 6510G2 AMD HD 6510G2
vs
GTX 280M 280M
HD 6510G2 AMD HD 6510G2
vs
GTS 360M 360M
HD 6510G2 AMD HD 6510G2
vs
9800M GTS 9800M GTS
HD 6510G2 AMD HD 6510G2
vs
GeForce 705M 705M
HD 6510G2 AMD HD 6510G2
vs
GT 320M 320M
GT 415M NVIDIA GT 415M
vs
HD 6510G2 6510G2
GeForce 410M GeForce 410M
vs
HD 6510G2 6510G2
GeForce G210M GeForce G210M
vs
HD 6510G2 6510G2

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 29 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6510G2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 230M or Radeon HD 6510G2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.