GeForce G210M vs Radeon HD 6510G2

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6510G2 and GeForce G210M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6510G2
2011
1.31
+297%

HD 6510G2 outperforms G210M by a whopping 297% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10331316
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.63
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameno dataGT218
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)15 June 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40016
Core clock speedno data625 MHz
Number of transistorsno data260 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data14 Watt
Texture fill rateno data5.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.048 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data72
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno dataUp to 1 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno dataUp to 500 (DDR2), Up to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataDual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVIVGA
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+275%
16
−275%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Valorant 30−35
+30.8%
24−27
−30.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+107%
14
−107%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Valorant 30−35
+30.8%
24−27
−30.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Valorant 30−35
+30.8%
24−27
−30.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Valorant 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how HD 6510G2 and GeForce G210M compete in popular games:

  • HD 6510G2 is 275% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 6510G2 is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 6510G2 is ahead in 30 tests (91%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.31 0.33
Recency 14 June 2011 15 June 2009

HD 6510G2 has a 297% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Radeon HD 6510G2 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G210M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6510G2
Radeon HD 6510G2
NVIDIA GeForce G210M
GeForce G210M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6510G2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 84 votes

Rate GeForce G210M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6510G2 or GeForce G210M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.